NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
Category:

World

CommentaryOpiniontechnologyU.S.World

The Consumption of Humanity

by Nicole Crawford 06/02/2025
written by Nicole Crawford

2 december 2024 – 9:49

under capitalism, we are always looking to revolutionize and further consume people, as commodities, within our relationships. always thinking that we should run away from security and stability, thinking that settling into a place, planting roots, is unrealistic and unattainable, impractical. we are trained to consistently seek the next thing, to become inherently unsatisfied and unsatisfactory. 

we are never fully present in love because we are conditioned to assume its end and replacement, we are always predicting loss, that our experiences of one another can only be temporary. we have no incentive to choose one another in this world, to stay, to build and grow, because we expect to be left behind, to be replaced, to lose one another. 

we do not stay within discomfort, we do not transcend it, because the capitalist within us tells us to start anew at all times, this voice, behaving as a parasite to our truest needs in community, tells us that longevity, accountability and commitment to each other and ourselves, to community and restoration, to repair and love, to honor, is temporary and therefore nonexistent. 

the only long term thing we can imagine and believe in (to imagine and believe are incredibly different acts of faith), is our perpetual suffering, inevitable collapse, and misery.

as the masses, we are strangers to love, to a home that is not easily destroyed, to places to which we can return and rest. this existence is a disease. to believe that goodness can only survive outside of where we currently are, that love can only be cultivated, nurtured, and flourish in far away gardens, with flowers foreign to our own soil, is torment. we become a problem to which there is no solution. we begin to find our resolve in lovelessness.

we begin to develop our faith in a certainty that we are anything but chosen, everything outside of the bounds of worthiness, anything but capable of this distant love. 

many of us cannot imagine being known within our misery and despair. we cannot imagine being intentionally held, called by our names, honored as sacred. we have nothing to give but our truth, our rawest, most undeniable forms which cannot be exchanged on the market. we cannot imagine why people would desire to keep us with nothing to sell. we can only understand absence and abandonment. we justify and accept our insignificance and replacement, marking ourselves inevitably disregarded. within the belly of the beast, we look for answers and this is the only plausible reality. 

in the absence of our ancestors, we believe lies. 

06/02/2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentaryNewsPolitical EducationU.S.World

“This Country is Broken”

by Hanae Noirbent 03/11/2025
written by Hanae Noirbent

“This country is broken.” 

No. 

This country is functioning according to its design. Founded upon the labor of the enslaved and the displacement of the Indigenous, this land we call united was fractured from its very conception. The current administration is not a mistake in the history of this nation but rather a product of it. And yet, amidst the knowledge that the citizenship we hold dear is a stolen identity or one that has been given to us by force, we still find ourselves dreaming, wishing the fires erupting with vigor, the red lines drawing blood in the concrete of our cities, were all mere accidents.

We cannot avoid the truth of what this country was built upon nor the values which anchored its inception. Acknowledging those histories will bring us to our crossroads, where the climate crisis culminates to a state of emergency, where censorship becomes law, and where our bodies continue to be properties of a state willing to break them to meet its ends. But as I said, we are at a crossroads. We are at a pivotal moment where yesterday cannot be reversed but perhaps tomorrow could open new expectations. Ultimately, it is our inaction which will cost us our future. So then, where to begin? 

Let us begin right here, on this first page. Established in 1968, NOMMO was the first ethnic newsmagazine established on a public university campus. Its principles were anchored in an era where the rights of Afrikan peoples were virtually non-existent and in this critical moment, we find a specter of that movement reemerging. In that time when NOMMO was the space for our people to create with radical optimism and hope for the tomorrow, we persevered. And today, upon these pages, we ask you to do the same. Not to glance at news cycles without batting an eye but rather to sit in the discomfort and engage in our voice. Not to believe the work we have done is over but rather to understand that collective liberation is more than simply occupying spaces. We must interact with our environment, and question it to always keep the dynamism of change at the forefront. 

We invite you to keep engaging with us as we question our environment and our roles, as we extricate ourselves from our positions of complacency and admit to our agency. We invite you to find strength in yourself, to pick up your tools of creation and express who you are as change comes from within. We invite you to rest as well, and to know that the fight lives on and we will welcome you to join us when you are ready. 

There is no land of the brave or the free. But there are the people whose search for bravery and freedom inspire a vision that acknowledges our shared generational traumas and projects them into a commemorative work. We cannot change our past, but if we reclaim the principles justifying it we can alter the course of not only the next four years, but the next four hundred. So that the children of our children will know the Earth and their ancestor’s beauty and why they should protect it. 

03/11/2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentaryHealthLifestyleNewsPolitical EducationU.S.World

Afrikan Agarianism – Subcultures 

by Bahji Steele 03/10/2025
written by Bahji Steele

For over 400 years, our hands tilled the soil, not by choice but forced through our captivity in chains. Promises of reparations crumbled, leaving us landless in a country we built. It’s no wonder that when you hear “Afrikan Amerikkkan” and “farmer” in the same sentence, optimism feels out of reach. This is especially true in hyper-developed cities like Los Angeles, where many of our ancestors fled after emancipation, seeking freedom beyond the fields that once enslaved them. Denied our 40 acres, shut out from land ownership, and systematically displaced, we’ve been pushed further from the idea of cultivating our own ecological balance. But what if we reclaimed it? What if the soil was always ours to begin with? 

Tucked between two weathered apartment buildings, just off the roar of the 91 freeway and Rosecrans, lies Compton Community Garden—a hidden oasis of renewal and resistance. Here, in the heart of a so-called food desert, life blooms. Temu, a Compton native and horticulturist who helped bring CCG to life, poses a powerful question: “Compton has the most ideal weather for organic gardening, yet we’re still considered a food desert? How did we get here? Is this by accident? We have the chance to change the narrative—to restore balance, heal ourselves, feed ourselves, employ ourselves, and build collective wealth.” A garden may seem simple, but in a world designed to keep us disconnected from the land, it’s nothing short of revolutionary. It’s a space to nourish bodies, reclaim community, and cultivate a future rooted in self-sufficiency.

“For our ancestors, farming was not a symbol of oppression, but rather a symbol of resistance and freedom. Every time we plant a seed, we are committing an act of sovereignty.” 

These words from Leah Penniman, author of Farming While Black, reframe farming as a means of liberation. As each seed is planted, so is the possibility of a new reality—one where food justice, sustainability, and collective power take root in Compton and beyond.

03/10/2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentaryHealthNewsPolitical EducationU.S.World

Building Futures in the Midst of Ecological Destruction

by Orisha Lamon 03/10/2025
written by Orisha Lamon

The destruction that ripped through the populous Los Angeles Basin tied with the improper governmental response is nothing but a repeat of unpreparedness for numerous environmental catastrophes that results from the ruling entities’ failure to properly assess the crumbling infrastructure of the LAFD, climate change response, and lack of social services for the needs of the people. The decimation of structures, homes, and memories, in one of the most influential cultural hubs in the world has received a devastatingly inadequate response from the City of Los Angeles that has in turn bolstered community-oriented and mutual-aid-centered engagement holding up the societal infrastructure before its entire demise. As we plunge deeper into a christo-fascist and sensationalist state given the current political representatives, there is a greater need for disciplined community building, protection, and practice. 

Los Angeles is widely discerned as a capitalistic foreground for gentrification and dispossession. This area of over 9 million has cultivated some of the most influential cultural and political communities and stances. The destruction of such space caused by wildfires, mudslides, torrential rain and pressing environmental and state-sponsored destruction creates a clean slate for landowners and private property management firms that prey on the devaluation of Afrikan and marginalized communities. The city’s vision of serving the people throughout the most notable Eaton and Palisades fires was through the mass-deployment of police officers to prevent looting, and preventing folks from being able to see their homes. The historic area of the Afrikan middle class in Altadena may never recover. The homes of folks who have been there since the Great Migration are gone and likely never to be rebuilt due to the lack of state resources. This mass displacement of a majority Afrikan community has prolonged and will greatly influence the confinement and racialized banishment of Afrikan folks in America. As evacuation shelters, like the Pasadena Civic Center, begin to book events such as America’s Got Talent recordings and award shows, not even 2 months after destruction leaves these folks displaced with municipal support dying down. I would like to ask: Where were these health concerns for the ongoing pandemic? For the Afrikan elders? The unhoused? For the poor air quality? For serving the community material resources? Diapers, medications, proper PPE? That was all thrown together by community members impromptu, nonprofit, and political organizations. The criminalization of such movement of essential resources and tools of organization is a threat to the current regime of surveillance in Los Angeles. Mass displacement and resource isolation, similar to the actions taken toward the devastation of Hurricane Katrina and the failed state response, ties into the intentionality behind structural barriers of justice and support. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina hit the South, displacing almost 1 million people with 40% of evacuees from Louisiana unable to return to their homes. Thousands are still recovering from the ecological degradation and trauma associated with loss alongside a lack of social safety nets already foretold the inadequate state response to disasters that impact the most marginalized. With displacement the Afrikan community of the Katrina impacted South faced white vigilantism coupled with lack of health infrastructure, prompting the conservation of a declining Afrikan population. This is not to present comparable figures looking at Katrina and the Los Angeles fires but serves as a call to our conditions. We must adapt and restore using material and tangible changes. Today we stand and ask where are we to go from here, from pessimism to revolutionary optimism, smashing imperialism, to practice, to pedagogy, to discipline, to care, to love. In reflection I ask: What are some starting points we can use to create community organization and begin our struggle toward an Afrikan revolutionary praxis?

03/10/2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CampusCommentaryNewsWorld

Hypocrisy and Censorship

by Nadine Melanesia Black 11/10/2024
written by Nadine Melanesia Black

An oppressive silence fills classrooms when students bring up topics surrounding Palestine and the encampment to almost any UCLA educator, dancing around the topic anytime it is mentioned in relation to what we are learning in class, which has left me puzzled as this is a glaring contradiction.

On Sept. 5 UCLA outlined a “Four Point Plan for a Safer, Stronger UCLA” that claims to focus on “enhancing community safety and well being, fostering a culture of engagement, learning and dialogue across difference, prompting freedom expression in line with University of California policies, and continuing to evaluate how to support our diverse community.” Through these four points, UCLA admin is further repressing students’ freedom of expression by regulating how one expresses themselves under the guise of creating a “safer campus environment.” Even within UCLA’s mission statement they claim to want to “ensure freedom of expression and dialogue, in a respectful and civil manner, on the spectrum of views held by our varied and diverse campus communities” and to have an “open and inclusive environment that nurtures the growth and development of all faculty, students, administration and staff” through debate and critical inquiry.

The hypocrisy of the facade that UCLA puts on for admitted students who are eagerly awaiting to attend a university to have fulfilling discussions and debates on current topics in comparison to the reality of silencing their student population is jarring. 

How is it that Palestine is a central part of the current global political discourse, yet this is rarely talked about in the classes of the Amerikkka’s “#1 public university”? In emails regarding the encampment, why is it that the former Chancellor Gene Block dedicated only a measly sentence about the immense suffering of Palestinians but claims to not take a side?

Students are being punished for exercising what they have learned at this school, including ideas surrounding how social norms can be challenged to gain more rights for marginalized people, with courses relaying acts of resistance throughout history via both physical and online spaces. The absence and censorship of educational safe spaces for conversations surrounding Palestine disallows for any growth or learning for students.

Monitoring and censoring what is being said in classrooms won’t stop student’s ideas and hunger for change, but only further highlights UCLA’s compliance with the mass killings in Palestine.

UCLA admin cannot continue to ignore the pleas of their students. Cries against the oppressive system of white supremacy that UCLA benefits from are drowned out in favor of maintaining the UC’s tidy and rule-following facade. If this school wants to truly comply with their mission statement, they would need to allow for students to express themselves in and out of the classroom.

At the bare minimum, discussion and dialogue around Palestine is essential in educational spaces, and banning this exchange just shows what UCLA stands for, whether they explicitly say it or not. However, a conversation alone is not enough to elicit true change against an oppressive system. Continuous resistance against the status quo and forcing the administration and government to hear our voices must be practiced as a collective community.

11/10/2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentaryNewsU.S.World

Technology is Never Neutral

by Bahji Steele 11/10/2024
written by Bahji Steele

The adoption of generative AI presents both significant challenges and potential benefits for Pan-Afrikan communities in the United States. A recent McKinsey report, The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier*, highlights the technology’s global economic impact, which could reach up to $4.4 trillion across industries. However, as organizations begin to explore AI’s applications, concerns are rising about its effects on Afrikan employment, particularly for Afrikan men.

A separate McKinsey report, The Future of Work in Black America, paints a grim picture of AI’s potential to disproportionately impact Afrikans in America. The report finds that Afrikan workers are overrepresented in jobs at high risk of automation and underrepresented in roles more likely to remain secure. Due to state and institutionalized racism, the job market has historically been harder for Afrikan men to succeed and make a living. It also reveals that half of the top 10 occupations held by Afrikans pay below the federal poverty line for a family of four, and all pay less than the national median salary of $52,000. Many of these jobs, predominantly held by young Afrikans without college degrees, are also among the top 15 occupations most at risk of AI-driven job loss.

The racial wealth gap further complicates the situation. A 2016 study by the Corporation for Economic Development and the Institute for Policy Studies found that, if current economic trends persist, it would take 228 years for the average Afrikan family to accumulate the same wealth as the average white family.

Yet, if approached with an equity lens, AI has the potential to help close this wealth gap. By investing in reskilling workers for non-automatable roles and promoting emotional labor jobs over physical or manual ones, AI could create new opportunities for Afrikans in Amerikkka. Furthermore, generative AI holds promise as an educational tool, a crucial factor given that a lack of higher education is a significant barrier to upward mobility for many Afrikans. If implemented thoughtfully, AI could be a catalyst for economic inclusion rather than exacerbating racial disparities.

11/10/2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CampusCommentaryNewsU.S.World

Internal Transformation and Collective Liberation

by Nicole Crawford 11/06/2024
written by Nicole Crawford

this is the 21st century and we need to redefine r/evolution. this planet needs a people’s r/evolution. a humanist r/evolution. r/evolution is not about bloodshed or about going to the mountains and fighting. we will fight if we are forced to but the fundamental goal of r/evolution must be peace.

we need a r/evolution of the mind. we need a r/evolution of the heart. we need a r/evolution of the spirit. the power of the people is stronger than any weapon. a people’s r/evolution can’t be stopped. we need to be weapons of mass construction. weapons of mass love. it’s not enough just to change the system. we need to change ourselves. we have got to make this world user friendly. user friendly.

are you ready to sacrifice to end world hunger. to sacrifice to end colonialism. to end neo-colonialism. to end racism. to end sexism.

r/evolution means the end of exploitation. r/evolution means respecting people from other cultures. r/evolution is creative.

r/evolution means treating your mate as a friend and an equal. r/evolution is sexy.

r/evolution means respecting and learning from your children. r/evolution is beautiful.

r/evolution means protecting the people. the plants. the animals. the air. the water. r/evolution means saving this planet.

r/evolution is love.

Assata Shakur

When abuse is prevalent within our most intimate relationships, we find ourselves limited and hypocritical in our passive attempts to adopt liberatory frameworks and practices into our lives. As people who are intrinsically webbed into a broader international struggle towards collective liberation, we are subject to colonial, imperial, and white supremist violence on a macro-institutional scale. However, our focus on the plight of Afrikans through the lens of combating fascist and militarized violence, institutional exclusion, and discriminatory systems of power, while necessary, can often externalize the roadblocks we face to achieving Pan-Afrikan collectivism in a way that overshadows and disregards the deeply rooted internal transformations that must take place. 

Intercommunal violence exists among the organizations, structures, and people who are most affected by the forces of state-oppression and intimidation. This is not surprising. When routinized to function as part of a larger system of power we are likely to consciously, but more often unconsciously, adopt western, hyper-individual, and abusive ways of knowing, thinking, imagining, and interacting as a means of survival. This brings us into dialogue regarding one main question: Does the liberation of Afrikans require internal transformation?

Christopher Lavender, a first year transfer studying sociology, provides us with a common perspective to ground our discussion on the matter. He says, “Yes, let’s just call it how it is. I believe so. With Afrikans you are weighed against anyways all throughout life, especially here, they say it’s the land of the free, but we are not really free.”

This analysis is not only shared among most people within the Pan-Afrikan diaspora, but it’s simply true. Faced with the institutional barriers of police violence and systematic oppression, the disconnect between the promises of the imperial core and our lived reality are jarring. 

According to the Los Angeles Times, “Since 2000, at least 1018 people have been killed by law enforcement in Los Angeles County” and “almost all of the dead were men, nearly 80% were Black or Latino. More than 92% were shot to death”. So, to say that we as Afrikans are privileged enough to see the fruits of equity and liberation would be to lie to oneself. We are in desperate need of social transformation and of tangible solutions, this is clear. However, to sustain these transformations outside of the sensationalized deaths of Afrikans and performative protests, we require a change in how we view ourselves and deep understanding of the degree to which structures of violence influence our communities. 

Caila Chappell, a third year senior and political science major explains this as she says, “While there are oppressive systems in place that are keeping people of the Afrikan diaspora down and from being able to access certain things, I think that no one else will free you but yourself. The people that are oppressing or in these oppressive positions are not going to be the ones to free you because they’re benefiting off your oppression, so you would have to take within yourselves to be able to overthrow the places in power that are keeping you in whatever position you are in”. 

She also reminds us of where we as Afrikans have come from. “Throughout history, typically the people who have freed Afrikans are themselves. I think a lot of history is misconstrued through a white-savior complex lens. For instance, you have Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves when in reality that was not the goal to free the slaves, it was more so a political move and even after that while they may not have been physically in chains, Afrikan people were still enslaved. So, I think the only way that they were able to achieve some sort of freedom or a greater freedom than they already had was through convening with themselves”. 

This perspective unveils to us a new depth of truth and commitment that is required in our attempts to adopt liberatory frameworks and longevity in our struggles towards collectivism and self-determination. We must understand our histories, not from a linear perspective, but from an analysis that allows us to recognize patterns of erasure, oppression, and violence when they are happening before our eyes. Our failure to legitimately consider these parts of our practices is often what prevents us from integrating the external accountability that we expect from violent institutions into our own lives and immediate communities. 

Failing to consider these aspects of struggle makes it hard to create autonomous solutions to the intimidation and degradation that we face, but more importantly, it is dangerous. When we fail to identify that we too can adopt practices and mindsets of hyper-individualism, colonialism and imperialism, we become a danger to our broader global community. 

Kenya has become one of the latest examples of this as they have started their interventions in Haiti. “Kenya has sent troops on missions inside and outside Africa, but no African country has ever led a security mission outside the continent” and while Foreign Minister Alfred Mutua said  “Kenya stands with persons of African descent across the world” this is false. “Washington has increasingly grown reliant on Nairobi for its security interests in the Horn of Africa in recent years” and this is a perfect example of blackface imperialism and how our negligence in adopting measures of self-accountability and internal transformation will always lead to more harm (Al Jazeera). 

Simply put, “Abuse of all kinds, specifically systemic abuse, translates to abusing each other” said Caila. 

Nathanial Tesfai, a first year transfer studying history and political science echoed this sentiment as well. “In Afrika today, the World Bank is giving countries unfair loans” but he explained that “my family jokes about it, in Kenya they promise prosperity and end up stealing from the treasury”. 

Our inability to honor the duality of our plight as Afrikans is killing us both literally and metaphorically. We are responsible for not only challenging the external systems of power that we can recognize, but furthermore, challenging ourselves to reframe how we form community. We as Afrikans are in a need of a deep shedding and metamorphosis and while this is grueling work, it is absolutely necessary as we continue to plant the seeds of struggle for our future generations to nurture and reap. 

Assata Shakur says, “the power of the people is stronger than any weapon. a people’s r/evolution can’t be stopped. we need to be weapons of mass construction” and this is true. We are responsible for one another, in grief and in healing, and understanding this is the only way that future generations will begin to experience the ease and autonomy that our ancestors have struggled towards.

11/06/2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CampusCommentaryNewsWorld

Whose University?

by Nicole Crawford 10/06/2024
written by Nicole Crawford

The guidelines for the Public Expression Activities that were outlined within the Time, Place and Manner policies, which were released on Sept. 4, included statements such as, “Don’t conceal your identity with the aim of intimidating any person or group or to evade recognition“, “Don’t set up tents, campsites, or other temporary housing… on UCLA property”, and no distribution of food or access to specific walkways unless permitted by the university between midnight and 6 a.m. 

Many of these policies are subjective and infringe upon the rights to free speech, neglect equitable access to food and housing security, violate public health and safety precautions, and only allow students to use two-percent of their campus space to express grievances about how their tuition dollars are spent. Students have a right to protest against the complicity of their university in the ongoing genocide against Palestinians and intimidation of the Global South. The administrative opposition to this intrinsic right has left students questioning who the university is actually trying to protect: the students or the zionists the administration funds? 

According to William Ramataboe (he/him), a first year graduate student pursuing a masters in business association, there was no problem with these policies and nothing that violated human rights. Adding, “I read it quick so I might have skipped something” but this analysis simply cannot be true. 

It is clear that the university administration does not view the students that fund UCLA as part of their communities of concern as they continue to wield their power to silence, intimidate and erase student voices and acts of resistance on campus. This brings us again to the question of fascism, ableism and the ever increasing presence of these institutions of violence in our lives. Fascism is understood as a political ideology that prioritizes the “good of a nation” above individual interests, “contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism”, “forcible suppression of opposition” and “the tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control” according to Britannica and Merriam-Webster. Ableism is defined as “discrimination or prejudice against individuals with disabilities” (Merriam-Webster). 

Working with these two definitions we can begin to understand the implications, of the Time, Place, and Manner policies, on the quality and freedom of student life and movements across campus. The university is actively working to protect economic interests, public image, and appeals to zionists at the expense of moral and ethical protections. With a ban on the ability to practice masking during an ongoing public health crisis (COVID) and only allowing protests in partially-inaccessible areas of campus, the university has now positioned itself in direct opposition to those fighting for disability-equity and justice. Additionally, this decision was made autonomously without the input of the students whose financial support acts as the bloodline of this university, meaning that the rights to cultural, political, and individual expression and determination can no longer function within this space. So whose university is it really?

Jonny Garnett (he/him), a fourth year undergraduate sociology major agreed with this analysis as he said that this was a “response [to] last spring protests that the school put in place to go against public expressions” He said, “I feel like everyone should have freedom to express themselves” and that this was “limiting people from calling out violations” adding that he did not “agree with them putting restrictions”. 

While students have until Nov. 4 to express their opinions to the University on these policies at public comment, this decision has undeniably forced students to return to a more restrictive and censored campus environment. 

For Afrikans at UCLA and across the globe, the topic of student protests, censorship and university policies are intrinsic to our universal experiences on campus. In times of hyper-surveillance, increasing fascism, and violations of human rights, the Time, Place and Manner policies and UCLA campus climate are only but a microcosm of the international struggles towards liberation and intersectional solidarity we all face. 

10/06/2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Latest Posts

  • Black Pain is in Fashion: Catharsis in Relation to Black Horror
    by Samantha Talbot
  • Violent Recollections: Memorializing Black Life
    by Orisha Lamon
  • I’m Him
    by Bahji Steele
  • What Happened to the Artist?
    by Hanae Noirbent
  • The Consumption of Humanity
    by Nicole Crawford

Back To Top
NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate