NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
Tag:

anti-Blackness

Archive

USAC Representatives Pass Resolution to Address Racism, Supporting SJSU Activists

by 02/05/2014
written by

In response to verbal and physical assaults on a Black first-year student by his three white roommates at San Jose State University (SJSU) in November, UCLA’s Undergraduate Students Association Council (USAC) unanimously agreed to adopt a resolution that takes a stance against racism and to propose actions to support tolerance and diversity.

The resolution adopted Tuesday, January 22, hopes to confront these ongoing issues. It consists of USAC President John Joanino and External Vice President Maryssa Hall writing a joint open letter to Gov. Jerry Brown endorsing a statewide review of the condition of Black students within higher education. It also calls for UCLA to add a race studies component to its general education requirements.

The type of harassment the SJSU student experienced stunned all campuses and sparked a protest at SJSU. According to a spokesman for the Santa Clara District Attorney’s office, the White students placed a bicycle lock around the neck of the Black student, put up photographs of Hitler, hung a Confederate flag, and wrote racial epithets on the whiteboard in the suite they shared.

USAC officers said these incidents indicate a need for greater diversity and for UCLA to take a stance on the issue because being silent is irresponsible. “Even though it happened at a different campus, UCLA students are taken aback by the fact that it was allowed to happen,” Hall said. “We at UCLA are involved in a wide range of coalitions with other UCs and other state schools. We should definitely be taking a stance.”

nommopic

San Jose State University students gather around the 1968 Olympic statue while protesting a reported racial hazing of an African-American freshman student, Nov. 21, 2013, in San Jose, Calif. Karl Mondon/San Jose Mercury News/AP Photo

For many years, underrepresented students on campus have been victims of hate crimes, harassment, and various forms of exclusion based on their race, and it is time for the university to take action against these incriminations.

“Students and faculty members have been lobbying for a diversity-related requirement for more than 25 years, but UCLA remains the only University of California college without one,” said Christine Mata, Assistant Dean of Students for Campus Climate. “Learning about other cultures and issues that aren’t necessarily from our background is key to understanding how we interact with each other as a campus,” she said. “The more we learn about diversity, the more open we are to positive interactions.”

Faculty in the College of Letters and Science rejected the proposal in June 2012 with a vote of 224-175. One concern raised by voting faculty members in 2012 was the feasibility of the requirement.

A similar diversity-related requirement proposed in 2004 was also voted down.

The requirement would have had students in the College of Letters and Science take one general education course that focuses on understanding differences between people of diverse communities. Professor Leuchter said a diversity requirement is imperative to ensure students participate in a common experience in order to send a strong message about our campus’ commitment to diversity.

02/05/2014 76 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Editor-in-Chief Dasha Zhukova Sits on Naked Black Woman

by 01/27/2014
written by

dasha-zhukova-black-woman-chair-miroslava-duma-buro-247-interview

On January 20th, 2014, Martin Luther King Day, an online magazine entitled Garage, published a photo of its Editor-in-chief, Dasha Zhukova, sitting on a chair made to resemble a half-naked Black woman. Miroslava Duma, the blog’s editor, posted the insensitive photo on Instagram, and further marketed the image as something of trending, fashionable, and contemporary art.  In the image, the Moscow-born 32-year-old, wearing a pressed white button-up and crisp blue jeans, rests on a chair designed to portray a life-form Black mannequin that is naked, excusing a pair of leather black panties, a belt strapped around her lower body, elbow length gloves and skin-tight, and knee-high boots.

Dasha Zhukova responds to the criticism: “The chair pictured in the Buro 24/7 website interview is an artwork created by Norwegian artist Bjarne Melgaard, one of a series that reinterprets historical artworks from artist Allen Jones as a commentary on gender and racial politics. Its use in this photo shoot is regrettable as it took the artwork totally out of its intended context. I regret allowing an artwork with such charged meaning to be used in this context. I utterly abhor racism and would like to apologize to those offended by my participation in this shoot.”

Despite, her claim, the backlash of noted fashion journalists and the common public have displayed their disapproval of Zhukova’s work of art as a form of degradation.  Claire Sulmers, the editor of Fashion Bomb Daily, spoke of the unfortunate feature and calls the image an example of “White dominance and superiority, articulated in a seemingly serene yet overtly degrading way.”

“These issues and concerns highlight the conflicts found within the continued suppression of the Black female body in the fashion industry and its urge to be addressed. The art and fashion industries are the few bastions of society where blatant racism and ignorance are given the green light in the name of creativity,” Sulmers complained.

Claire Sulmers could be making a significant point. Although the chair is supposed to be portraying vision and creativity, it is offensive, tasteless, and one cannot help but to be investigative about the motives behind the editorial, and the reasoning behind its overall inspiration.

In response to the negative and insensitive imagery, how do we as a Black community continue to effectively address these issues that plague the fashion industry? Also, how do we highlight the issues circulating the recurrent theme of the Black body being dissected, misappropriated, and exploited in the media? What do you think of Garage Magazine’s fashion editorial? Can it be perceived as a work of art or as flat-out, blatant racism? Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

01/27/2014 70 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Peggy Noland’s Shocking Oprah Dress

by 12/16/2013
written by
Peggy-Nolands-Outrageous-Oprah-Dress-

Source: Fashion Bomb Daily

Most recently, there has been quite a stir about the particular fashionable taste of fashion designer Peggy Noland. One of her graphic dresses displays a life-size image of what appears to be an unknown, and unclothed, Afrikan American female with a photo-shopped image of Oprah’s face in exchange.  There are multiple images of women and even one with an image of a KISS member photos-shopped as the head of the body.

Looks familiar doesn’t it? I’m sure UCLA students are quite familiar with similar occurrences happening against the Dr. Christian Head versus UC Regents, where Professor Head was mocked in a class presentation and his head cropped onto an image of a kneeling gorilla. Only this time, they done went and tried to play Oprah! Stirring questions about the dress itself have assessed many critical debates and disagreements.

In fact, in XOjane.com, Black writer Veronica Miller expressed her outrage with the dress and shared her disapproval. Miller writes:

“‘Progressive’ White women, you need to quit. This thing that you keep doing, exploring your own issues with repressed sexuality and body image through the use of Black women who didn’t give you permission to be self-image surrogates? [It] needs to stop, and it needs to come to an end now. Not now, but RIGHT now. We are not playgrounds where you get to explore your issues. You don’t get to use our bodies as the shield behind which you throw up your middle finger up at patriarchy. These stunts make you no better than patriarchs, no better than misogynists. You take our bodies apart and display them in pieces the same exact way you admonish advertising, fashion and music for doing. That is hypocritical behavior and hypocritical behavior is tired.”

Peggy Noland wearing her "design"/ Source: Fashion Bomb Daily

Peggy Noland wearing her “design”/ Source: Fashion Bomb Daily

Miller’s disapproval cannot be dismissed as illogical. In fact, it is quite common for members of the Afrikan American community to share experiences dealing with being ostracized or feeling singled out for their physical features. Fashionbombdaily.com stated, “Black women have dealt with the misappropriation and exploitation of their bodies by others since Saartjie Baartman first stepped onto European soil in the 19th century. It’s 2013—you’d hope people would know better by now. Sadly, they don’t.”

And just when you thought it couldn’t get worst.

Lena Adelsohn Liljeroth, Sweden’s Minister of Culture and Sports, was video-recorded laughing and smiling as she posed with other coworkers in front of the cake of an Afrikan woman. (See it for yourself: www.youtube.com/watch?v=etAYFadObVY)

Now this was not just any ordinary cake. In fact, Black artist Makode Aj Linde who designed the cake described the pastry dessert as a ‘genital mutilation cake.’ Linde designed the cake to make screaming, painful noises as it was being sliced into.  As people sliced into the “woman’s vagina”, the depiction behind it suggest she was being “mutilated.”

In the video, the people who are indulging in the cake are seen standing around laughing in enjoyment and making a mockery of the Black bodied cake.

Is there a thin line between what is appropriately considered creative and ill bred? How much more do Black women have to overcome in order to be viewed as whole beings and not as human spectacles? How far is too far and where can we as a community begin to send waves and break barriers in order to correct these problematic issues found in the Afrikan-American community?

 

Raise your voice in the comment box below!

 

Author: Ashley Joseph

Nommo Staff

 

12/16/2013 2,804 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Us vs. Us: The Fist Divided

by 11/27/2013
written by
UCLA student-athletes (right and left) and UCLA student (center)

UCLA student-athletes (right and left) and UCLA student (center)

To be a Black student on campus is to be both seen and unseen: seen in the sense of recognition as an outsider, yet unseen as the apparition of a true deserving Bruin.

With this, UCLA’s Afrikan-American community should be a congregated sanctuary; even-being true, the miniature community still stands divided.

Why aren’t UCLA’s Black students and student-athletes more involved with each other?

In 1966, Black student-athletes founded UCLA’s Afrikan Student Union (ASU) to promote acceptance of more students of Afrikan decent into UCLA. Forty-eight years later, not only are these student-athletes uninvolved with (their founded) ASU, there is now a division between the Black student-athlete and the Black student.

So why does UCLA’s Afrikan American community stand divided? Here are some of the myths revolving student-athletes and “regular” students of the Black community.

1. Regular students don’t believe Athletes are as intelligent as the “regular” students. Dawnielle Baucham, track athlete, recollects, “Do they have something against us? Two weeks ago a guy came up to me and asked me, ‘what’s up with all the Black students here being athletes?’ I was sort of insulted, like, I had to have a certain G.P.A to get into the school, they don’t accept [just] anyone – you have to meet the criteria.”

2. Athletes think students are arrogant.  Robin Corruth, of the Women’s Softball team, states, “[Regular students] are always angry, they always look very mean – they look non-approachable”.

3. “Regular” students think student–athletes are pompous due to their athlete-related celebrity. Jor’el Jones, a non-athlete, states, “I think that there’s an ego portion to the problem – athletes have a ego due to being top-university athletes, and the students have an ego due to being scholars at UCLA. – this creates a separation.

Casting these rumors and prejudices into shadow, here are some of the facts.

Facts:

1. Student-athletes admire the non-athlete student body.

“I really do admire the fact that they were able to come to this prestigious university without, you know, being an athlete – that’s a great feeling,” says Dawnielle Baucham.

2. Student-Athletes’ schedules are constantly filled with sport related events.

Lacy Westbrook, a red shirt football sophomore, states that his days are comprised of, “Workouts, breakfast, meetings, practice, class…, then after-words you’ll have a meeting with your coaches or team meetings, then from there you’ll go to tutoring then you’re in your room doing homework, or sleep”.

Robin Corruth states that her days are comprised of being “On the softball field, in the classroom and studying in the library – [I dedicate] 19 hours a week to softball related activities.

All-the-while, Jor’el Jones, a regular student, confesses that he has, “All morning classes, Monday through Thursday my days start off early, I come back and relax until I feel its time too work again – then it repeats Monday through Thursday.”

3. Student athletes and regular students have different goals.

“I’ma keep it 100 wit’ you, sometimes, some of my friends in my clique feel as though it’s not a good idea to have a friend –that’s a non-student-athlete. [We] aren’t really the same, we’re two different types of people. The athletes’ life is always busy, we live in a different world, whereas a regular student is more focused on academics,” says Lacy Westbrook.

4. Student athlete’s want to refrain from being tied to one individual group, especially one tied simply to race.

“Athletes feel they should be more diverse than just the Afrikan population,” says softball player, Robin Corruth.

5. “There are no spaces that bring together both, athletes and students,” Cameron Crutison, third year, non-athlete.

With a vast majority of the 1,082 Black UCLA students being athletes, it is vital that this 3.8% of the student population ban together as one collated community. It is vital that the already small group of Black students ban together. When the “Westwood Bubble” bursts, we are all of the same community, facing the same issues. With comments as, “Sometimes it feels as though there aren’t that many of us here” (Lacy Westbrook), it is evident that athletes too, are aware of the small community. There needs to be a redefined unity between all Black students on campus.

Though time never seems to permit association, and goals differ amongst the standard scholars and student-athletes, the barrier dividing the Afrikan-American community must be bridged and destroyed – otherwise, our community’s interest will continue to be overlooked as we hold minimal numbers. With this, the question stands – How do we bridge the gap?

 

Author: Adar Carver

Nommo Staff

11/27/2013 316 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Oprah Says Obama Is Disrespected Because He Is Black

by 11/19/2013
written by
US President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama chat with talk show host Oprah Winfrey in 2011. Winfrey told BBC that racism is still a problem/ MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

US President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama chat with talk show host Oprah Winfrey in 2011. Winfrey told BBC that racism is still a problem/ MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

 

In the weeks leading up to the inauguration of President Barak Obama in 2008, there was an ominous suspicion lurking around America. Many Americans waited in anxious anticipation, bearing in mind the extreme lengths to which white bigots once traveled to keep blacks from voting, wondering if the racist ghost of America’s past would surface to remind us how close 2008 is to 1960.

To the surprise of many, the event went relatively smooth: there were no assassinations attempts, no Klu Klux Klaners picketing the white house, or any such protests.

Was the suspicion unnecessary paranoia? Has the election and reelection of an AfriKan American proved that racism’s career in the US has joined the “free love” moment and bell-bottoms as antiques of the American past?

Oprah Winfrey, a supporter of President Obama, thinks not. In an interview with the BBC news, Winfrey said, “I think there is a level of disrespect for the office and that occurs, in many cases…because he’s Afrikan American.”

Winfrey’s comments have ignited debate around the country, with one side viewing her comments as divisive race bating, and others seeing it as “telling it like it is”.

“The majority in the house are republican…they tend to try to make him look bad, and try to make him look like he’s doing a bad job. I think they’re doing it because of his race,” said Omar Hassan, a Philosophy major at UCLA. Omar’s comments mirror the ideas of many students who believe Obama’s opposition is racially motivated, such as Erin An, also a Philosophy major at UCLA who said, “If you look at the Tea party, they’ve had some very interesting things to say about Obama. So yea, I think in general, a lot of Obama’s opposition is because of race.”

Others feel that the election and reelection of an Afrikan American to the oval office has more to say about America’s progress than is being acknowledged. “I don’t think Obama’s opposition is because of race, I think it’s because of policy. If you look at the things he supports, like abortion or Obama-care, a lot of people disagree with these policies… so that’s why they oppose him,” said Krislam Junsay, a Global Studies and Philosophy major at UCLA. He went on to say, “I’m not saying that there is no racism, because there is…but we are moving forward.”

The notion that the United States has racially progressed seems to be a social axiom. As Oprah stated, “It would be foolish to not recognize that we have evolved, and that we’re not still facing the same kind of terrorism against black people on mass.” The degree to which we have evolved, however, is up for discussion.

“Racism is there, it isn’t as blatant as it was before…but it’s more subtle,” said Sam Rountree, a Philosophy and Public Policy double major at UCLA. Rountree’s comment expresses the beliefs of many people that don’t see progress as solvency.

Notwithstanding the disagreements about the degree to which America is getting past racism, nearly everyone seems ambivalent about the ability to put it in the past. “With the America we have now, it’s not possible,” said Rountree. He added, “We can’t stop people from being racist, but we can stop how it’s institutionalized.”

When asked if the Americans can get past racism, Hassan responded, “Well, we got to start small, and take it one step at a time. But it probably isn’t possible because we’ve grown up learning stereotypes and racist jokes that keep it alive… so we gotta start small with each generation if we want it to stop.”

Junsay, the Philosophy and Global Studies student said, “Racism is still a big problem, and we should acknowledge that. But, I think the percentages of people who dislike Obama, because he’s black, are in the minority. So we’re moving forward.”

Between 39 to 54 percent of Americans disapprove of how the President is doing his job according to new Quinnipiac University poll, making Obama’s approval among voters lower than it has ever been for any other president.  Rather this spike in his popularity is because of the color of his skin, or because of the content of his policies, this issue maybe debated for a long time.

 

Author: Michael Holmes, Jr.

Nommo Staff 

 

 

 

11/19/2013 87 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Dominican Court to Revoke the Citizenship of Thousands

by 11/15/2013
written by
DOMINICAN-HAITI-CITIZENSHIP-DEMO

Dominican-Haitians protesting court’s decision to revoke the citizenship of thousands. Photo Credit: Huffington Post

Due to a recent Dominican Republic (DR) court ruling, over 200,000 Dominican citizens are in danger of becoming stateless. According to the court, all individuals of ‘migrant background’ born in the DR since 1929 will have their citizenship questioned and possibly revoked.

The controversial verdict stands to severely affect the descendants of Haitian immigrants residing in the country. “We really don’t know what’s going to happen to those people… these people are not Dominican citizens and will have to leave and effectively go to Haiti, where they are also not citizens. It creates an extremely complicated situation,” states Wade McMullen, an attorney at the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice & Human Rights. It is a tragic case of a people without a home—individuals that are treated as outsiders despite being born and raised in the Dominican Republic.

This is not the first time Haitians have been unwanted in the country. One of the most infamous historical examples of the mistreatment of Haitians under Dominican rule occurred in 1937, when Dominican President Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Molina, ordered the execution of over 20,000 Haitians residing in the country. The overwhelming majority of the slain Haitians were Dominican citizens.

The Parsley Massacre, known as El Corte (the cutting) to Dominicans and Kouto-a (the knife) to Haitians, was carried out by Trujillo in an attempt to “whiten” the Dominican race. He promoted the concept of la Hispanidad (Hispanic Culture) in his homeland in order to separate Dominicans from their Afrikan roots; furthermore, he circulated anti-Haitian propaganda in order to distinguish his countrymen from the “Black” people on the other side of the island.

His propaganda has had a lasting effect on the culture and mindset of the Dominican Republic.  Nearly eighty years later, Haitians living in the country have fewer opportunities and face widespread discrimination.  Many believe that the fervent racial tension between Haitians and Dominicans led to the court’s decision; furthermore, some fear that the verdict will lead to further prejudice against Dominicans of Haitian descent.

According to the Associate Director of the International Human Rights Clinic at Berkeley School of Law Roxanna Altholz, “The Dominican Republic has very deep roots of violent racism against Dominican-Haitians and Haitians. Are they going to do summary expulsions? Is the Dominican Republic going to conduct raids? I don’t know how they’re going to implement this decision,” she said.

Fortunately, the implementation may not have the chance to occur. People around the world are showing their support for the Dominican-Haitian citizens. International human rights advocates plan to take the case to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, an autonomous body that seeks to protect the rights of individuals residing in the Americas. Widespread demonstrations have taken place in New York City, with Dominican and Haitian immigrants united against the decision.

One Latina American took to the web in order to protest the injustice occurring in the Caribbean country; her bid, which urges Dominican President Danilo Medina to revoke the court’s controversial verdict, has already garnered nearly 1,000 signatures. To support the petition, click here.

 

Author: Sharila Stewart

Nommo Staff

11/15/2013 46 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Classism: The New Racism?

by 11/06/2013
written by
Kanye West (left) on the Jimmy Kimmel Show

Kanye West (left) on the Jimmy Kimmel Show

Nothing displays the ills of society’s views towards race in media more than an outburst from Kanye West. Whether it is a comment about who should rightfully win an award or explaining George Bush’s lack of concern for Black people, Kanye may be seen as irrational, but he does highlight important oversights in the Black community.

On October 10, 2013, during an interview with Jimmy Kimmel on his show “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” West explained his frustration in his attempts to create a couture fashion brand due to his career as a rapper and the discrimination against his profession. In his long-winded tangent, West remarks on a new type of discrimination; “It’s not about racism anymore; it’s classism, that’s what I talked about. Paula Deen, she was old-school with it. They’re like, ‘We don’t do it like that anymore, Paula Deen. We’re classist now.'”

Is “classism” the pseudonym for a new type of racism that ranks according to socio-economic class?

According to the U.S. Social Security Administration, “White households in the United States are far wealthier than Black or Hispanic households, a disparity that remains unexplained even after taking into account income and demographic factors.” So the level of discrimination that is resonating not only in media, but also in everyday society is now hidden within the barriers of socio-economic status, in which minorities are at the bottom. Even in situations where prominent artists such as Kanye West are concerned, because he is a rapper, he is disregarded as someone who is in the upper level of the population’s economy.

 Although Mr. West is a rapper, a common idea in the Black community is that if you are not a rapper or a basketball player, it is beyond difficult for an Afrikan-American male to be successful, and almost impossible to join the top one percent. With this understanding of the lack of minorities in the higher bridge of the economy, classism can easily be a new way to isolate one ethnic group from another.

 West remarked on the barriers he feels that he is unable to break due to these ideals.

“And you’re just like, ‘How can you get a shot?’ And then you try to do it on your own, and like, real designers will not work for a rapper, and you just cannot overcome it.”

Overcoming has always been a struggle for people who know what “starting from the bottom” really entails. However, this new idea of classism in society is starting to shadow another form of racism. Whether in-between the intricacies of celebrities of everyday people, this affects the lack of progress that individuals such as Kanye West are trying to make in different realms. Regardless of the reputation Mr. West has in hip-hop or fashion, classism seems to be the new trend he’s bringing to attention.

Author: Semaj Earl

Nommo Staff

11/06/2013 39 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

My N***A, My N***A!

by 10/31/2013
written by
yg

Rapper YG

Five months ago when I first heard the song, “My N***a”, by local rapper YG, the first thing I noticed was the beat. Immediately, I found myself grooving to it. Initially, the lyrics weren’t too bad. I was used to YG’s subject matter so nothing came off particularly shocking.

Then came the hook.

The word “n***a” is repeated a total of eleven times. Not only is the use of the word excessive, it is also the only lyric throughout the second part of the hook. Literally, the last four bars of the chorus are dedicated solely to that word. As my shock faded away, I admit I continued to bob my head. By the time the hook repeated, I was singing along.

I couldn’t deny its beat, and regardless of the lyrical content, the song was catchy. When the song was over, I hit the replay button. By my second listen, it had made a home in my head. Throughout the next few days, the song was a constant hum in my mind.

Last week as I scrolled through the top songs on iTunes, I was met with YG’s blatant yet catchy tune sitting at number twenty-five.

I was in shock.

Questions immediately formed in my mind: How can this song have made it to not only mainstream status, but to number twenty-five as well? How can this song, with such explicit lyrics that even the title had to be bleeped out, climb the mainstream ladder? How are people of different races responding to the lyrics of the song?

Earlier this week, I decided to interview students of different racial backgrounds to get their opinion on the song by asking four simple questions:

1. How do you feel about the song?

2. Do you like the song?

3. How would you feel if you had to sing this song in public?

4. How would you feel if you had to sing this song in front of a group of people that identified with a racial or ethnic group outside of the group you identify with?

At the end of the survey, I was faced with a very different question to ask than what I had initially set out to.

First, as expected most people said they would either feel embarrassed or awkward singing it in public and in front of people of a different racial background, while some said that they just wouldn’t sing it all.

One student of Middle Eastern decent, Sarah Rahimi [a fourth year IDS major] said, “I wouldn’t sing it. It’s not my word to use.”

Another student, Aaryn O’Quinn, an Afrikan-American fourth year student said, “I wouldn’t sing this in public. It would be like making a mockery of my people.”

Nonetheless, there were a few that said they would feel comfortable singing it in public, depending on the space. Third year Afrikan-American Aerospace Engineer major, Trevon Rodney claims, “It’s all about the location. I would feel just fine singing it on the Afrikan Diaspora floor [a residential community specifically aimed at Afrikan-American students], but I wouldn’t feel comfortable singing it in Ackerman Student Union.”

As I said, all of this was expected. What wasn’t expected however, was how hard it was to talk about the lyrical content when it came to that word. While talking about the song, one thing that struck me was how awkward almost all non-black participants were when answering the questions. And it wasn’t just non-black students. In the beginning, even black students did their best to skate around the word before finally just saying it. While I definitely didn’t expect the participants to just go out and say it, I didn’t think it would be that hard to talk about. Almost all knew the song so the presence of the word wasn’t unexpected. Furthermore, they had the opportunity to read the lyrics beforehand. None were fazed until it was time to actually talk about it.

As I started the discussion, all participants that weren’t of Afrikan-American decent tensed up and almost stammered through their responses. Nobody wants to say the word, which is understandable, but it was like the word left their voices immobile. “The N-word” was obviously the replacement of choice. However, “That word” and “You know…” were often used as well. The issue wasn’t their euphemism of choice, it was the way they used it. Regardless of the word that was chosen, somehow the word they had tried so hard to avoid still got the best of them. Prior to having to acknowledge the word, they were effortless in articulating themselves. However, “That word” left them immobile. One participant of Latino decent seemed to be so stumped that I actually gave him permission to say it. He was a little awkward at first but as soon as he said it, it was as if a weight had lifted off of him. The word was the biggest elephant to have ever occupied a room.

When I asked how they would feel if they had to sing the song in public, just the thought  entering their brains caused them to choke up.

For those who were embarrassed during the interview I understand that my Afrikan-American ethnicity could have been a part of the issue, but I was still taken aback.

For our one-on-ones, some students felt the need to overcompensate for their responses, and went into lengthy explanations of why it was okay for them to feel embarrassed about it.

One participant, a white female third year Political Science major says, “The song seems to be using the word in a non-historically racist way, almost as another word for friendship or brother… If I were to sing this song in public, I would hope for acceptance and to be able to convey that I wasn’t in any way trying to use it in a racist manner.”

While her response was standard enough, the amount of energy and effort put in was, in my opinion, way too much. You would have thought the participants were trying to solve the answer to world peace. In a way, maybe they were. We all know that racism is something that has plagued this country since its inception, and in my opinion something that has not been properly dealt with. Slavery and racism are always referenced as America’s dark past, and it seems like nobody is willing to shed the proper amount of light on it. We talk about it sure, but it’s always in a sugar coated politically correct way, full of euphemisms to make everyone talking about it feel comfortable, which is ridiculous because something as ugly as slavery shouldn’t make people feel comfortable.

Then it hit me. Although we as a country like to boast about living in a post-racial society, we have failed as a nation to educate each other on how to have a mature conversation about race. We haven’t learned how to be uncomfortable and learn from that awkwardness. Instead, we hide from the past and create euphemisms so we never have to really face it. We say “The N-word” because then we don’t have to truly think about the implications of it because it’s not that word, it’s the “N-Word”, and we get away with having yet another sugar coated conversation about race. Talking about this aspect of history should leave the people discussing it feeling anything, but comfortable.

I am going to say the word.

Nigga.

There.

Let the feeling of being uncomfortable sink in and deal with it. Now, with nigga aside, lets have a real conversation about race.

Are you for or against the use of nigga?

Author: Hailey Harris

Nommo Staff

10/31/2013 115 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Latest Posts

  • Curls in the Cubicle: The Legacy of The C.R.O.W.N. Act & What’s Left to be Done
    by Julia Elizabeth Perry
  • No Laughing Matter: Resistance and the Redefining of Afrikan Humor
    by Orisha Lamon
  • Skip Erewhon, Simply Wholesome has the O.G. LA Wellness smoothie
    by Bahji Steele
  • Museums Suck: The Getty’s Black Photography Exhibit
    by Faith Olaleye
  • Use of Force, the Long American Tradition
    by Bahji Steele

Back To Top
NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate