NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Skip Erewhon, Simply Wholesome has the O.G. LA Wellness smoothie
Tag:

black

CultureLifestyleOpinion

[bl]acne

by Leilani Fu’Qua 05/14/2020
written by Leilani Fu’Qua

Let me preface this with the statement that acne is completely normal. However, European and mainstream beauty standards play a major role in how people view themselves with acne, how they see and treat others, and the impact the treatment of acne, especially in minority groups. As a multiracial Black woman, my personal experience with acne has been a less than pleasant one, and I feel that it is important to have an open discourse on issues that influence the way Black people view beauty. 

First, I want to address the language surrounding acne dialogue. Most people are referred to as “sufferers of acne,” which assigns a negative connotation and implies a subconscious hierarchy to the spectrum of people with acne. Acne doesn’t make you inferior to someone with clear skin in the same way that having clear skin doesn’t make you phenotypically superior to someone with acne. 

A lot of the time, the hereditary nature of acne is often disregarded, leading to the belief that acne is always completely temporary and “fixable.” The truth is, some people are more prone to get acne, and washing your face with pink grapefruit scrub isn’t a surefire pathway to clear skin. According to The Guardian, a genetic difference in hair follicle structure that makes the skin more prone to harboring bacteria could be the causative factor behind the likelihood of exhibiting acne. Without genetic testing, however, it is evident that acne runs through familial lines. As a young girl struggling to feel accepted because of my ethnicity and class, being one of the only Black girls (or girls in general) with distinctly noticeable acne played a critical role in my search for identity. 

As time passed, I used various methods to attempt to hide or diminish the appearance of my acne, including picking my pimples. As most people know, except me at that point, picking your pimples leads to major scarring and allows bacteria from the extracted acne to infect surrounding areas, inherently leading to MORE ACNE. I was giving myself more acne without even knowing it. SO, I took up what is now one of my favorite art forms and modes of expression to cover this skin-tastrophe: makeup. Wearing makeup (and cheap makeup, at that) allowed excess dirt build-up in my skin, and also emphasized the skin’s bumpy texture. David Lortscher, M. D. says, “Technically, most makeup doesn’t cause acne, but certain ingredients can clog pores, which helps acne-causing bacteria grow.”. While it did make me more comfortable and confident with the consolation that at least people couldn’t see my acne, it drew more attention and commentary than expected. 

I call this time the era of microaggressions: not only was I one of the only Black people in my classes, but I had acne. People knew I didn’t like having acne, and I wore makeup to cover said acne. Anyone with acne has surely experienced the phenomenon of someone simply not minding their business and feeling the need to unsolicitedly comment on others’ appearances. To this day there are people (often with clear skin) who will verbally inform me that I have a breakout (like I can’t see my own face), ask if I only wear makeup to cover my acne (which is not the case), and indirectly voice their opinions on a third party’s acne, often times expressing disgust at how someone could “let their skin look like this.” While sometimes excusable on the grounds of ignorance, these comments are rarely taken with a grain of salt. Personally, I internalized them and convinced myself that maybe I did look “sickly” if I didn’t wear makeup and that having acne meant I didn’t wash well enough, didn’t care about my appearance, or that I would be eternally subjected to being associated with “gross” acne. 

I went to a high school where a large majority of students were non-Black people of color. I didn’t have anyone with similar intersectional experiences in regards to being Black, having acne, and wearing makeup to reference. The Black girls who I could merely compare myself to had moderate to highly clear skin, with the exception of a hormonal breakout. With this, I chose to struggle individually in an attempt to protect my own feelings: I failed to communicate when people’s comments hurt me, failed to reject the mainstream beauty standards presented and failed to ask for help on how to not hate my skin. 

Now, I have come to a point of understanding. Having acne, having people point out your insecurities (even if you don’t initially see it as insecurity), comparing yourself to girls who have never had a breakout in their life, and going above and beyond to change the way you are perceived by society are all entirely normal things to experience. I had to relearn and redefine what I conceived as beauty, moving away from the detrimental, intrinsically European standard that having fair, clear skin, a small nose, straight hair, and 3% body fat was the only way I could feel beautiful. Today, with my acne on a wave of breakouts, I offer an open invitation to change the mindset towards acne. If you hate your acne, if you love it, if you still can’t come around to being content with it, at least make sure it is your choice to feel that way rather than an attempt to conform or resist a “traditional” beauty standard. And lastly, allow yourself to be AT LEAST satisfied, if not delighted, with the beauty you emit both inside and out.

05/14/2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Black is Just as Beautiful

by Briana Tracy 03/01/2016
written by Briana Tracy

Standards of beauty  vary from country to country. However, one type of beauty that struggles to be accepted is the Black beauty. Black beauty features like thick hair, full lips, large breasts and butts are all highly sought after by other races, but these features are deemed unacceptable if a Black woman has any of these.

M.A.C. Cosmetics recently received negative comments about using a Black model wearing their makeup for during New York Fashion Week. The company posted a close up image of the model wearing a dark shade of lipstick on her full lips.

On social media, one comment that expressed true ignorance in regards to Black beauty stated “Black women will never be as beautiful as white women. The only argument Blacks have is they have more melanin like that matters *laugh emoticon* Yes white women can get injections and when they do they are basically flawless.”

Comments such as the one previously stated adds to the stigma that Black is not beautiful, even though many want the admirable features of a Black woman. Negative comments make it a little harder for some people of color to accept their skin color and features when they are constantly being criticized and disliked about their beauty.

Fourth-year Matthew Moore, an American Literature and Culture major, comments, “I feel like now we are pushing pro-Black which I feel like is a really good thing for people to do. As far as just getting [Black] men and women to love themselves and love all of their features, but of course because we live in this particular society pro-Black is seen as anti-White.”

When a person of color is present in white dominated industries in an effort to increase diversity  problems often occur surrounding their natural physical features. For Black women in the fashion world these problems include lack of makeup that matches their skin tones, clothing that does not adequately cover their curves, and hairstylists unable to work with their tightly coiled crowns.

When asked about the negative feedback towards M.A.C. Michael Moore continues, “It is so threatening especially in cosmetics or fashion or any other type of industry where you promote different body shapes, hairstyles, or features on your face. I believe that is why it is so threatening and why so many people who are not of color are getting riled up about this whole pro-Black movement which is decades behind.”

Similarly, there were comments made that confronted the irony that Kylie Jenner was praised for getting lip fillers last year, yet the Black M.A.C. Cosmetic model was subjected to racist and hurtful remarks for the natural appearance of her lips. The notion that someone such as Kylie Jenner can receive compliments for fillers while a Black woman with natural full lips receives hate is a form of societal double-standards.

Although double-standards are normally associated with gender roles, it can also be associated with culture. The idea that novelly Black features, such as wearing braids or having a large butt, are widely accepted and admired by non-Blacks, but are not as adorned when naturally displayed adds to the double-standard.

Accepting the beautiful features of Blacks, but not accepting those features on Blacks themselves, pushes any progress towards diversity back to square one.

 

03/01/2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

In Detail: USAC’s Resolution to “Divest from Corporations Supporting the Private Prison Industry” Passes

by 02/07/2014
written by

On Tuesday, February 4, the Afrikan Student Union at UCLA brought forth a resolution to the Undergraduate Students Association Council’s (USAC) weekly meeting.  The goal of the resolution is to “divest undergraduate students association and UC Los Angeles’ from corporations profiting from the Prison Industrial Complex.” For those who are not familiar with the resolution and its implications, it sets out to address and to act as part of the solution towards many of the issues that Black and other minority students face both on and off campus, in relation to the “Private Prison Industry.” According to the resolution, corporations that have ties to the use of inmate labor include, Wells Fargo, Vanguard Group, Blackrock Fund Advisors, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Invesco Finance LTD, JP Morgan Chase, and Procter & Gamble.

The meeting began with a public comment from Kateisha Menefield, Vice-Chair of the Afrikan Student Union, who introduced the resolution that demands UCLA to take “Responsibility not just as Bruins, but as simple human beings.”

DSCN1111

Students listen as public comments are shared./ Amber Tidmore- NOMMO Staff

Following Menefield’s lead, other students presented their own comments.  Devin Murphy, President of the Black Pre-Law Association said, “The [Private Prison Industry] is utilizing human beings in prisons to make more money,” and with a push from our government for more funding, “our tax dollars and student fees are going into this funding.” Murphy furthered expressed personal experience as a Black male on campus, “There is a surplus of African American men in prison, why is it not a surplus of African American men on this campus? That is an issue. When we talk about the idea of campus climate and feeling included, how do I feel included when more of me are in prison than on this campus, am I suppose to be here? That’s the question I ask myself.”

Black Bruins were not the only students present to support this issue, as other ethnic groups voiced their concerns:

“I do not want people to fall into the trap that Black History is [only] Rosa Parks and Harriett Tubman… because the Jim Crow Laws still lives on in [the form of] mass incarceration, and we have to recognize that history repeats and is disguised in different forms… [We] should use this legacy of Black History month to educate ourselves and to make an actual change” – UCLA student of Palestine

 Before the council members were to vote on the resolution, Kamilah Moore, Chair of the Afrikan Student Union, and Maryssa Hall, External Vice President of USAC, presented some alarming statistics to the council members and to the public:

“More Black men are under correctional control today than were enslaved in 1850, and… Black women are the fastest growing segment of the juvenile justice population and the criminal justice system.”

The Black inmate percentage is almost half of the incarcerated population, totaling nearly 40 percent, which correlates with the school-to-prison pipeline phenomenon. The resolution further states that in the Los Angeles Unified School District in the years 2012-2013,  “Latino students were more than twice as likely as White students to be ticketed, [and] Black students were almost six times as likely as a White student to be ticketed.”

Males make up 70 percent of these statistics.

Despite the issues and statistics presented, the resolution and public comments were marked with criticism. The use of what is considered to be “divisive language,” was the least of the students worries who contributed to the public comment portion of the meeting. However, after Moore’s and Hall’s presentation, there were small grammatical errors being critiqued by some of the council members. While in an article published that same day before the meeting took place, Natalie Delgadillo of the Daily Bruin also focused on critiquing the rhetoric of a presentation from the resolution, and how public opinion could weaken the goal of passing it.

DSCN0976

Students listen as public comments are shared. /Amber Tidmore- NOMMO Staff

Delgadillo said, “Sometimes the oldest, most overused clichés ring the truest.  A resolution set to be presented at the student government meeting tonight has an old grammar school adage looping in my head:  ‘It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it’.  She concluded that in deciding whether or not to pass a resolution, “Councilmembers must always consider [if] a resolution is the best way to address an issue they find worthwhile – and if that answer is yes, its authors must work to make sure the resolution’s purpose isn’t marred by pointlessly divisive or extreme language.”

Criticism seemed to deviate from the issue being presented, and only ten council members approved the resolution while the rest neither abstained nor denied it. Despite criticism, many of the council members expressed support, and for some, the personal experiences of the students resonated.

In spite of this, the personal experiences of students are still viewed by some as “pointlessly divisive or extreme language.”  It is clear that there is still work to be done, not only for the Black community, but also for all students on and off campus.

See the link below for an updated version of the resolution, and a list of the endorsers of the resolutions:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RfkEEfbq8FqXpPm8Og1O7Sb4wZ6XoqNEp0AupW5SAN8/edit?pli=1

List of endorsers of the Resolution:

Student/Campus Organizations:

  • Harambee Council at UCLA
  • USAC Office of the President
  • USAC External Vice President’s Office
  • USAC Cultural Affairs Commissioner
  • USAC General Representative 3
  • Incarcerated Youth Tutorial Project
  • Student Coalition Against Labor Exploitation

Individuals in support:

  • Avinoam Boral Internal Vice president of the Jewish Student Union
  • Liz Friedman Women in the Physical Sciences President
  • Devin Murphy President of the Black Pre-Law Association
  • Janay Williams member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc

Community Organizations:

  • Alliance for Equal Opportunity in Education and Community Coalition of South Los Angeles
02/07/2014 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

The Colbert Family Responds to the Interracial Cheerios Commercial

by 02/05/2014
written by

Hours before the Superbowl, I got the chance to sit down with the Colbert family and hear their thoughts concerning the racial controversy that surrounded, and perhaps even eclipsed, their six-year-old daughter’s first acting job in a Cheerios commercial as the child of a bi-racial couple. With a sequel commercial aired during the Superbowl, the issue of interracial couples is back on the table; and this time with all of America watching.

 

Interviewer: Michael Holmes Jr

Interviewees: The Colbert family- Christopher Colbert, Janet Colbert, and Zoe “Gracie” Colbert

 

The Colbert family: Christopher Colbert (left), Janet Colbert (right) and their six year old daughter Zoe "Gracie" Colbert (middle) / Photo courtesy: Michael Holmes- NOMMO Staff

The Colbert family: Christopher Colbert (left), Janet Colbert (right) and their six year old daughter Zoe “Gracie” Colbert (middle) / Photo courtesy: Michael Holmes- NOMMO Staff

 

What was your initial reaction to the backlash that came from the first video?

Janet: I was a little bit surprised that people were making an issue of this especially out here in California. I mean I know that the comments could have come from all over the world… but [because it was] vocalized, [it] was shocking. I can see someone internalizing and thinking, “Uggh, that disgust me” because of their internalized thinking or whatever. But to actually say the things that were said; I was just shocked. I was just like…really?

Chris: Me, on the other hand, as I said before, I was excited, because it gets the issue out. It allows us to have a discussion about [interracial relationships and biracial children].

If you think about it, America, we’re still very much divided and segregated.

 

Many of the racist comments expressed anger and even disgust at the sight of a mixed raced family. Is this what you encounter in daily life as an interracial couple?

Janet: No. As far as my social settings and my immediate family and friends, no.

 

So what does that tell you, when on the day to day you don’t get this negativity, but then the commercial received this kind of response?  

Janet: That our minds have progressed, but everyone’s hasn’t.

Chris:  You see, you have a local type of setting, and then you have a larger typesetting. Those people [who are responding negatively], they’re fine [with interracial marriage] as long as it’s local. But when you try to make this a national thing they’re like, naw, we’re not okay with this.

 

So do you think that a part of the backlash comes from the promotion of interracial couples?

Chris: Yup.

Janet:  Well, I don’t believe this ad was trying to promote interracial anything. I think it was just an ad. I think it was just a point about relationship; this is world we live in today, this is what we see.

I was actually excited about the fact that they were using parents that were actually representative of the child. Because a lot of time, with biracial children, they either go with a Black family or a White family.  So the fact that they actually [represented] where she comes from… I thought it was nice to have that representation, verses trying to make her look like she belongs to one or the other.

 

Given all the interracial marriages in the United States, why do you think there is still a marketing tubule with interracial couples? What does that say about America given that we have a Black president?

Chris: Look, let’s just face it; it’s always going to be here. That divide that has always been here from the beginning, it’s always going to be there. My take on is this… we won’t be stopped. What I mean by that is, people are going to love who they’re going to love. People are going to fall in love with who they’re going to fall in love with… which is what the commercial was trying to show… having this family shows that hey, there are two different groups of people who from two different background, who  happen to love each other, they came together and had this mixed child and so.… Have some cheerios. (He chuckled)

 

More people liked the video than disliked it, right?

Both: Yes.

 

Do you think this represents American perspective on interracial dating?

Both: Yes.

 

Who do you think the opposition was coming from? Do you have any ideas about rather the Whites or the Blacks are the aggressors as far as the negative comments are concerned?

Janet: Again, we have to remember with the diversity in the United States, there are not just two races. So it’s not just either this side, or these people. Because a lot of people were saying, “You know, women thought this and men thought that.” I don’t buy into any of that stereotyping at all.

 

What do you mean?

Janet: …Because the comments were saying perhaps they [the racist remarks] were coming from White men, who didn’t want to see a White women with a Black man; or Black women who didn’t want to see their Black man with a White women… you know what I mean? And I just don’t believe there was any stereotype with where the comments were coming for except from people that just really don’t have anything better to do than to try to be critical… and are uneducated and just kind of unaware of where we are today.

That’s not to say that people don’t have their own opinion. Everyone entitled to their own opinion, and there is free speech.  So they are welcome to say what they want to say but that doesn’t mean because that person who made the comment happens to be a White woman that all White women feel this way.

 

So I just want to get this straight; you saying that this isn’t coming from any one side; this is America as a whole, all races and genders, having a problem with this ad?

Chris: Yea, this problem is happening with Asian Americans who gets married and has children with a Black man. Or if there is a Native American Indian woman that married a Caucasian man…  it all mixes.

Janet: And it’s always important to remember that the negativity was a very small percentage. So I don’t think that this is a representation of where America is today.

 

So, do you think too much was made out of the racism? Was the negativity blown out of proportion?

Chris: Well, we can’t really answer that because it (the comments) got shut down pretty quick.

 

How is Zoey taking it all?

Janet:  She had no idea. It wasn’t until probably later on this school year… I’m thinking of that little Meme that said, “With all the problems in the world, are you really upset that my parents don’t match?” that’s kind of what she [Zoey] asked me. She said, “All this is because daddy is Black and you’re White?”  And I said, “Yea, a lot of it was.” And her face was like, “That doesn’t even make sense”.

All she’s ever been exposed to is parents that are together, that are raising her as a family, and that her brothers look just like her… so for her, it didn’t make any kind of sense.  The things that make sense to kids are: am I being fed? Am I being cared for? Am I being nurtured? You know what I mean?  They might not describe it in those terms… but kids just want to be loved, and they don’t care what their parents look like.

 

How do you two deal with the many problems that interracial children deal with as far as identity is concerned? Many individuals that are multi-ethnic are faced with the “chose your side” dilemmas. How do you deal with this as parents of multi-ethnic kids?

Chris: I am glad you asked that question.  On applications, school applications, or whatever, they ask what gender the kids is, and we answer accordingly. And then they ask, what ethnicity is the child. And they have both a primary and a secondary; and this is the way we fill it out:

In the primary area, we go Caucasian, and we go Black. And the secondary area…we put nothing!

Know that this is who we are; there is no primary and there is no secondary. So, when it comes to a full-blooded African American, and they have the primary and the secondary, they just put Black; they don’t do anything with the secondary. Caucasians just put Caucasian. So when it comes to mixed [children} there is no secondary.

We (gesturing to his wife) are one. The African American and the Caucasian came together and made one mix. So there is no secondary. There is no primary.

When our kids grow they will see that we filled out every application like that, and we will teach our kids to fill out an application like that.

 

So if someone asked, ‘What is your daughter?’ You would say…?

Chris: She’s mixed. She’s African American and Caucasian.

 

How did you feel when you knew they wanted to do the commercial again?

Chris: We just felt very honored that they wanted to bring back the family.  We thought it was really cool. I wasn’t happy that “Yay we’re gonna do the interracial message.” I was just happy it was the super bowl you know. Our daughter is an actress, what she genuinely wants to do is act… and she happens to be from a multiracial background

And, believe it or not, it’s still hard for biracial children to get jobs because they are not exactly what the producers are looking for. So the fact that they used her again, on top of it being the super bowl, I’m still speechless.

On the first video there was an ambush of racial comments. This time around there doesn’t seem to be much backlash. What do you make of this?

Janet: He doesn’t pay as much attention to this stuff as I do– I mean I read every single comment and I have been very very blessed by what I’ve read. And the feed back I’ve seen has been positive.

 

So where did all the racists people go?

Janet: Well, don’t get me wrong; there has been a few negative comments on the new YouTube spot. I read one today that said, “Oops, they did it again, now I want to puke” or something like that. So they’re still there, there just not as vocal this time around.

 

What do you guys hope will come from this sequel?

Chris: We pray for more opportunities, because this is something she loves and like doing—this is her dream.

We hope that this will open more doors for her and, hopefully, help bring America together.

 

You can watch the Cheerio commercial here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKuQrKeGe6g

 

02/05/2014 17 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

USAC Representatives Pass Resolution to Address Racism, Supporting SJSU Activists

by 02/05/2014
written by

In response to verbal and physical assaults on a Black first-year student by his three white roommates at San Jose State University (SJSU) in November, UCLA’s Undergraduate Students Association Council (USAC) unanimously agreed to adopt a resolution that takes a stance against racism and to propose actions to support tolerance and diversity.

The resolution adopted Tuesday, January 22, hopes to confront these ongoing issues. It consists of USAC President John Joanino and External Vice President Maryssa Hall writing a joint open letter to Gov. Jerry Brown endorsing a statewide review of the condition of Black students within higher education. It also calls for UCLA to add a race studies component to its general education requirements.

The type of harassment the SJSU student experienced stunned all campuses and sparked a protest at SJSU. According to a spokesman for the Santa Clara District Attorney’s office, the White students placed a bicycle lock around the neck of the Black student, put up photographs of Hitler, hung a Confederate flag, and wrote racial epithets on the whiteboard in the suite they shared.

USAC officers said these incidents indicate a need for greater diversity and for UCLA to take a stance on the issue because being silent is irresponsible. “Even though it happened at a different campus, UCLA students are taken aback by the fact that it was allowed to happen,” Hall said. “We at UCLA are involved in a wide range of coalitions with other UCs and other state schools. We should definitely be taking a stance.”

nommopic

San Jose State University students gather around the 1968 Olympic statue while protesting a reported racial hazing of an African-American freshman student, Nov. 21, 2013, in San Jose, Calif. Karl Mondon/San Jose Mercury News/AP Photo

For many years, underrepresented students on campus have been victims of hate crimes, harassment, and various forms of exclusion based on their race, and it is time for the university to take action against these incriminations.

“Students and faculty members have been lobbying for a diversity-related requirement for more than 25 years, but UCLA remains the only University of California college without one,” said Christine Mata, Assistant Dean of Students for Campus Climate. “Learning about other cultures and issues that aren’t necessarily from our background is key to understanding how we interact with each other as a campus,” she said. “The more we learn about diversity, the more open we are to positive interactions.”

Faculty in the College of Letters and Science rejected the proposal in June 2012 with a vote of 224-175. One concern raised by voting faculty members in 2012 was the feasibility of the requirement.

A similar diversity-related requirement proposed in 2004 was also voted down.

The requirement would have had students in the College of Letters and Science take one general education course that focuses on understanding differences between people of diverse communities. Professor Leuchter said a diversity requirement is imperative to ensure students participate in a common experience in order to send a strong message about our campus’ commitment to diversity.

02/05/2014 76 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Editor-in-Chief Dasha Zhukova Sits on Naked Black Woman

by 01/27/2014
written by

dasha-zhukova-black-woman-chair-miroslava-duma-buro-247-interview

On January 20th, 2014, Martin Luther King Day, an online magazine entitled Garage, published a photo of its Editor-in-chief, Dasha Zhukova, sitting on a chair made to resemble a half-naked Black woman. Miroslava Duma, the blog’s editor, posted the insensitive photo on Instagram, and further marketed the image as something of trending, fashionable, and contemporary art.  In the image, the Moscow-born 32-year-old, wearing a pressed white button-up and crisp blue jeans, rests on a chair designed to portray a life-form Black mannequin that is naked, excusing a pair of leather black panties, a belt strapped around her lower body, elbow length gloves and skin-tight, and knee-high boots.

Dasha Zhukova responds to the criticism: “The chair pictured in the Buro 24/7 website interview is an artwork created by Norwegian artist Bjarne Melgaard, one of a series that reinterprets historical artworks from artist Allen Jones as a commentary on gender and racial politics. Its use in this photo shoot is regrettable as it took the artwork totally out of its intended context. I regret allowing an artwork with such charged meaning to be used in this context. I utterly abhor racism and would like to apologize to those offended by my participation in this shoot.”

Despite, her claim, the backlash of noted fashion journalists and the common public have displayed their disapproval of Zhukova’s work of art as a form of degradation.  Claire Sulmers, the editor of Fashion Bomb Daily, spoke of the unfortunate feature and calls the image an example of “White dominance and superiority, articulated in a seemingly serene yet overtly degrading way.”

“These issues and concerns highlight the conflicts found within the continued suppression of the Black female body in the fashion industry and its urge to be addressed. The art and fashion industries are the few bastions of society where blatant racism and ignorance are given the green light in the name of creativity,” Sulmers complained.

Claire Sulmers could be making a significant point. Although the chair is supposed to be portraying vision and creativity, it is offensive, tasteless, and one cannot help but to be investigative about the motives behind the editorial, and the reasoning behind its overall inspiration.

In response to the negative and insensitive imagery, how do we as a Black community continue to effectively address these issues that plague the fashion industry? Also, how do we highlight the issues circulating the recurrent theme of the Black body being dissected, misappropriated, and exploited in the media? What do you think of Garage Magazine’s fashion editorial? Can it be perceived as a work of art or as flat-out, blatant racism? Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

01/27/2014 70 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Latest Posts

  • Museums Suck: The Getty’s Black Photography Exhibit
    by Faith Olaleye
  • Use of Force, the Long American Tradition
    by Bahji Steele
  • Black Girl, Take Up Space: Lessons From JaNa Craig
    by Mariah Yonique Strawder
  • Back to Black Wednesday: A Night of Jazz
    by Faith Olaleye
  • A Night with Willow Smith at Blue Note Jazz Club
    by Bahji Steele

Back To Top
NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Skip Erewhon, Simply Wholesome has the O.G. LA Wellness smoothie