NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
Tag:

feminism

LifestyleOpinion

Decenter Men. They’re ruining your friendships.

by Leilani Fu’Qua 10/28/2020
written by Leilani Fu’Qua

Do your friends only ever talk about what new man is in their direct messages? Are you the friend that only shares about her (straight) relationship or romantic encounters with men? You could be a victim of male identification, and you ARE entitled to financial compensation. 

Male identification is the act of placing men above women, including yourself, in various aspects in your life and relationships (Rich, 1980). For Black women, tendencies of male identification are notable through the placement of romantic relationships with men above platonic relationships with women. In our social spheres, it can manifest itself in three ways: 


Conversations with friends are heavily centered around romantic relationships with men

When male identifier individuals hang out with their women friends, the majority of the conversation is centered around their romantic prospects or relationships with men. They ask for advice about their relationship, speak about their romantic partner’s qualities, and over-romanticize the affection they receive from men. With Black women, gossip culture and hair salon conversations enable the male identifying woman to speak freely and openly about her relationships with men. However, less emphasis is placed on celebrating the Black women in their social sphere, while more attention is given to their life in proximity to men. 


The “Cater 2 U” Complex

“Cater 2 U” by Destiny’s Child is one of the most devotional love songs in recent music history. Still, it allows the male identifying woman to exist in service to men, despite the romantic underpinnings of the relationship. The “Cater 2 U” complex runs deep and stereotypes Black women as the caregiver and subjugate of their male counterparts. While the “male protector” role is prominent in the Black community, it perpetuates a cycle of women being dependent on their romantic partners in all aspects, including financial, social, and emotional well-being. Catering to your man can be cute, but the desire to do so may be rooted in fear, internalized misogyny, and allegiance to men out of necessity/survival. 

Embracing patriarchal culture under the #girlboss mentality

Independent women (unmarried, single, self-sufficient) can also be male identifiers as they adopt patriarchal culture under the guise of “leveling up,” and being a “girl boss.” In the Black community, the #girlboss mentality is outwardly harmless, but may obscure itself into self-colonization by seeking validation from male employers in order to reach success, belittling other women to achieve supremacy over them, or adopting the “think like a man” mentality when approaching success. It also allows long-running expectations for Black women to be strong, powerful, and lift themselves up by the boot-straps to persist, and masculinizes Black women disproportionately. 

Male-identifiers are usually unaware of their contributions to upholding the patriarchy, and these behaviors are normal! The patriarchal structure of many global societies centers men, and women are often socialized to engage behaviors that support these socializations. Instead of normalizing these behaviors in attachment to womanhood, we should analyze our own roles and consider how our subconscious daily actions contribute to our subjugation. As Black women, liberation is not a new phenomenon, and we must be dedicated to becoming women-identifiers. 

We must be committed to putting women first, analyzing the ways we participate in our own subjugation, and actively working towards being a good listener when women speak about their passions, aspirations, and struggles beyond lens of men. 

(These theories are developed from Adrienne Rich’s 1980 Essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Experience” and adjacent feminist works, but are completely subjective. )

10/28/2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Opinion

The Problematic Politics of the Women’s March

by Melody Gulliver 01/22/2018
written by Melody Gulliver

This past Saturday, January 20th, thousands of people and hundreds of cities participated in the 2018 Women’s March to rally against the Trump administration and its divisive politics. Feelings of resistance and solidarity were fortified through multitudes of signs, chants, organized treading, and riveting speeches.

For many, the march instilled feelings of hope and progress. But for others, the march preserved the same divisiveness it sought to dismantle.

Writer, S.T Holloway articulates this problematic incongruity in her Huffington Post op-ed, “Why This Black Girl Will Not Be Returning To The Women’s March.” In the article, Holloway recounts her discomfort with the lack of intersectionality at the 2017 Women’s March. She writes, “the reason I’m not going is because after having attended the march last year, I am well aware that the Women’s March is not for women like me.”

According to the Women’s March, its mission is to “harness the political power of diverse women and their communities to create transformative social change… [and to dismantle] systems of oppression through nonviolent resistance and building inclusive structures.”

Despite the Women’s March intent, its execution fails to provide adequate spaces and platforms for persons of color. The event speaks scarcely and vaguely about the complex experiences and biases endured by persons of color. It is dominated by heteronormative white women who at best, are not aware their pussy-power and “future is female” rhetoric is exclusionary. There is little strive to keep women of color in the conversation, and even less desire to have Black and Brown women lead the discussion.

So, who is the Women’s March for?

If it’s not for women of color, like Holloway, whose lives the current administration is so intent on displacing, diminishing, and deteriorating, then who?

If it’s not for Black transgender women like Mesha Caldwell who have been terrorized and brutally murdered without hope of political justice, then who?

If it’s not for women like Sandra Bland who have suffered unforgivable acts of police brutality, then who?

If it’s not for women like Recy Taylor who have fought bravely to have their stories of sexual abuse heard and validated, then who?

The march is marketed as a rally against the politics that concretize disparities in power including gender, race, and ability—both, physical and mental. With the march’s mission and magnitude, it had the potential to be revolutionary. And in some ways, it was. But any triumph is eclipsed by the self-serving white feminism by which it operates.

We need to do better.

01/22/2018 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Latest Posts

  • ‘We Gon’ Be A’ight’: Hope and the Fight for What’s Owed
    by Mariah Yonique Strawder
  • Recounting the Flames: A Year Since the Los Angeles County Wildfires
    by Mariah Yonique Strawder
  • The Heart of Africa
    by Orisha Lamon
  • The Creator
    by Bahji Steele
  • Modern Day Minstrelsy: Natalie Nunn, Zeus Network, Anti-Blackness, Caricatures
    by Mariah Yonique Strawder

Back To Top
NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate