NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Skip Erewhon, Simply Wholesome has the O.G. LA Wellness smoothie
Tag:

racism

News

H&M Criticized For Racially Insensitive Ad Featuring A Black Child Wearing A ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ Hoodie

by Melody Gulliver 01/11/2018
written by Melody Gulliver

Multi-national clothing company, H&M has faced immense criticism and backlash for a racially insensitive online advertisement which features a Black child wearing a green ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ hoodie.

H&M’s marketing mishap is particularly disturbing considering the long and horrific history of the racial slur. Since the 1800s, white individuals have augmented racial hierarchies by comparing Black individuals to simian species. To this day Black individuals are still actively resisting these racially prejudiced caricatures.

Immediately following the controversial ad, celebrity musicians the Weeknd and G-Eazy publicly withdrew their partnerships with the clothing giant.

The Beautiful & Damned Musician wrote, “After seeing the disturbing image yesterday, my excitement over our global campaign evaporated, and I’ve decided at this time our partnership needs to end.”

Despite the overwhelming outrage over the ad, many discredited the criticism and accused dissenters of being overly sensitive.

The mother of the H&M child model called the controversy an “unnecessary issue” and suggested criticizers “get over it.”

While the debate is still ongoing, this H&M scandal is not an isolated incident. Over the years, major companies have come under fire for promoting prejudiced and racially charged ideas in their advertisements.

01/11/2018 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Black Bruins Protest “Kanye Western” Themed Party: ‘Can We Breathe Here?’

by Ivy Briana Price 10/09/2015
written by Ivy Briana Price

Students marched to Chancellor Gene Block’s office dressed in all black attire on Thursday afternoon to protest events that took place at a fraternity house Tuesday night.

group (1 of 1)

Students and Supporters gather outside of Murphy Hall before marching to Chancellor Gene Block’s office .

Members of Sigma Phi Epsilon fraternity and Alpha Phi sorority organized a party themed “Kanye Western.”

Black Bruin Chibunkem Ezeenekwe reported that she and three friends witnessed this ordeal firsthand and were appalled. Attendees of the party were seen with black paint and soot covering their faces, dressed in baggy clothes, and adorned with gold chains. The fraternity and sorority’s racist depictions of African Americans continues the perpetuation of the stereotypical and disparaging manner in which African Americans were represented during and after slavery. UCLA’s Black community will not tolerate this type of behavior any longer.

Outraged by this instance of blatant racial insensitivity and culturally appropriative behavior, members of the black student body addressed these issues accordingly in Thursday’s demonstration.

In a spoken word piece graduate student Ree Botts articulated the attitudes held by many Black Bruins .“We deserve to be here… UCLA , can I breathe here?” she asked .

blm5 (1 of 1)

Afrikan Student Union Chairperson Janay Williams leads demonstration held at Meyerhoff Park

During the protest Vice Chancellor for Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Jerry Kang announced the interim suspension of Alpha Phi and Sigma Phi Epsilon’s social activities until the results of a thorough investigation are determined. During Kang’s statement on Tuesday’s events, he emphasized the importance of recognizing the social and cultural implications of one’s actions and considering the detrimental effects it may impose on other students.

“It is one thing to suggest that you’re focusing on one celebrity who is African American, but its another thing to take that as a license to perform every act, stereotype , attribute , and grotesque minstrelsy that you see…”he stated.

Demonstrators revealed an important question that fosters the discussion of UCLA’s social and cultural climate. What actions do you think UCLA needs to take in order to ensure that a welcoming, comfortable, and safe environment is readily available for black students?

Featured Below : More images of Black Bruins from the Demonstration. Photos taken by Ivy Briana Price (Navigate through gallery with arrows)

[slider animation=”fade, slide” slide_time=”4000″ slide_speed=”500″ slideshow=”true” random=”false” control_nav=”true” prev_next_nav=”true” no_container=”true”] [slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Camille2.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/taylor-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/LaJuan2-decreased-highlight.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/kya-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Kels-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/blm3-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/black-men-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/aaron-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/camille-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/blm4-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/blm-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Camille-.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/black-women-1-of-1.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][slide] [image src=”https://nommomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/taylor-1-of-11.jpg” alt=”Alt Text” type=”thumbnail”] [/slide][/slider]

 

10/09/2015 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Cardinals Fans: No Justice for Michael Brown

by 10/12/2014
written by

October 7– The video posted online by Argus Streaming News, shows a protest outside of a St. Louis Cardinals game demanding justice for Michael Brown, an unarmed African American 18-year-old who was shot in Ferguson, Missouri on August 9, 2014 by a Caucasian officer Darren Wilson. Many Cardinal fans were angered by the protest and only saw it as a sign of disrespect rather than a sign of distress. The video posted online by

The biggest question amongst the Cardinals fans is why?  Many of the fans were angered and confused by the location of the protest.  It may have been confusing to many, but it comes down to one word, exposure, whether in the media or exposure of the thoughts, attitudes, and opinions of several American people. Often coverage of major stories tend to gain the interest of the public, but as time goes on and coverage declines so does the public interest in the issue and their understanding that the issue still exist.  For Blacks racial profiling resulting in death is still a major problem facing the community. It seems that only a few cases actually make it to breaking news.  However, the video of the protesters makes it clear that racism is a problem in this country, and to some, it is a problem that no longer exist.  Although one group does not represent every American, the Cardinal fans expressed the opinions and attitudes of White American society.

It does not take long for things to get heated as the video shows an elderly Caucasian male looking directly into the camera referring to the protesters, “That’s right! If they’d be working, we wouldn’t have this problem!” (0:38).  The man’s yell is followed by a battle between chants, “Justice for Mike Brown!” (1:30), and “Lets Go Cardinals!” (1:39), then later, “Let’s Go Darren!”(2:40).

In the mix of the protest, one person swung the American flag upside down, an act that displeased Cardinal fans. The man taping the protest explains that the upside down flag is “The official symbol for when the country is in distress, and these protestors feel that the country is in distress with so many unprosecuted police killings of unarmed teens” (13:18).  In accordance, the USA Flag Site.org confirms the meaning of the upside flag, “The flag…is flown upside down only as a distress signal.” In response, a Cardinal fan yells, “I got family that died for that flag” (8:15), and orders the protestor to flip the flag around while a Caucasian female shouts, “We’re the ones who gave all y’all the freedoms that you have” (10:27).  Another woman even questions the man holding the camera whether or not he was a veteran, “How far did you get [in ranking]?” (11:58).

Majority of the fans seemed to be very angered by the protest as they continued with senseless chants such as repeating “Africa” and “USA”.  The negative reaction towards the protestors speaks for itself revealing that there is a lack of understanding of the turmoil’s that racism has caused within this country when looking at the history, roots, and foundation of America. And as the fans stand on one side and the protestors stand on another represents the divide in the country that many choose not to admit exist.  With all that occurred during the protest one has to ask what constitutes distress in America?

10/12/2014 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Racism Within the NBA: The Clippers and Donald Sterling

by 04/29/2014
written by

Los Angeles Clippers owner, Donald Sterling, has reminded America of a harsh reality: racism is real and it still exists today. Over the weekend, Sterling was caught on tape blatantly admitting his disgust for African American people. He was furious at his girlfriend V. Stiviano, an African American and Mexican woman, for posting a photo on Instagram with basketball legend, Magic Johnson.

Sterling states, “”I think the fact that you admire [Magic] — I’ve known him well, and he should be admired, I’m just saying that it’s too bad you can’t admire him privately. And during your ENTIRE FUCKING LIFE, your whole life, admire him — bring him here, feed him, fuck him, I don’t care. You can do anything. But don’t put him on an Instagram for the world to see so they have to call me. And don’t bring him to my games. OK?”

Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling and his girlfriend V. Stiviano

Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling and his girlfriend V. Stiviano

He goes on to state his disapproval of publicly associating with any Black people and even admits that he does not want Black people at his games at all. He loathes Black people, yet his girlfriend is part African American, how is that logical?

As if those comments were not enough, Sterling begins to sound like a modern day slave master by stating, “I support them and give them food, and clothes, and cars, and houses. Who gives it to them? Does someone else give it to them? …Who makes the game? Do I make the game, or do they make the game? Is there 30 owners, that created the league?”

African American males can play for the Clippers as a source of revenue for individuals like Donald Sterling, but they are not welcome as spectators or even respected as human beings. That notion sounds very similar to the idea that African American people could work on plantations as slaves, but could not step foot inside the master’s house.

Sterling’s remarks have obviously angered many people such as, President Barack Obama, Magic Johnson, Kobe Bryant, Snoop Dogg, and other NBA employees and celebrities, igniting a sense of hatred toward Sterling. But, his remarks have also brought a bigger issue to light: “post-racial America”. Currently, slavery and segregation are concepts that people brush off and label as a part of the past. The belief that racism does not exist anymore, and that race is no longer a defining feature is a misconception. David Sterling is one of countless people who still believe that African Americans are below people of other races, and the NBA and society as a whole needs to acknowledge that racism is still alive, rather than trying to turn the other cheek.

African American people are constantly stereotyped and mistreated on the basis of their skin tone. Throughout history, Black people have been exploited for their physical abilities and have been denied rights that other groups of people had. Donald Sterling is a prime example of how much further we have to go as a people. Martin Luther King, Jr. had a dream that all men would some day be equal, but that day is not today.

Magic Johnson’s twitter response to Sterling’s comments

Magic Johnson’s twitter response to Sterling’s comments

04/29/2014 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

UCLA Students Detained for Writing “White Supremacy Lives in the System”

by 03/04/2014
written by

To write an unspoken truth with the intent of delivering a message is well within one’s rights. – This holds true when the intent is not to maliciously: deface, destroy, or damage public property. (Refer to California Penal Code 594PC)

 

“How do I make an impact

In a system that teaches me “all is right?”

How do I impact a system

When the system itself is necessary to gain means of making an impact?

How do I make an impact

When my efforts seemingly go unnoticed?

How do I impact a system

That was spawn in corruption?

How do I make an impact

When my brothers rather work the system than change the system?

How do I make an impact…”

 

On March 4th, 2014: Two UCLA students were detained for chalking, “WHITE SUPREMACY LIVES IN THE SYSTEM,” on the wall adjacent to Charles E. Young Drive West.

Although this particular wall is notorious for messages written on it, the two minority students were detained and reported to both UCLA’s Dean of Students and the Los Angeles County Judiciary, and are potentially being charged for vandalism. There seems to be an irregularity in the regulation of “chalking” school property.

“As I bolded the block letters spelling “Supremacy,” I could hear people behind me saying, ‘Well, that’s unfortunate. [And] I wonder when that’ll be taken down.’ Words of understanding were superseded by words of disgust, as though, us writing what most Americans think true, was a forbidden immoral act.

A few hours before, my girlfriend came home shaking in tears – both angry and hurt – displeased that a Caucasian women around her age had “matter of factly” called her a ‘Nigger on welfare [who would be arrested if the confrontation was reported, because she was Black ’]. None aggressive, but instead spoken like a professor giving a lecture, the women asserted an unspoken truth – The system works for Caucasians.

We just felt like, if she can spitefully say it without pause, she (and so many others like her) could bear reading those words— though yet rarely spoken. The message was supposed to make people uncomfortable, especially those who take it for granted. Written in chalk, the message’s purpose was to promote critical thought and revaluation.” ~ [Conscious Advocates]

Attempting to fill in the last letters spelling “SYSTEM”, the same system being condemned for oppression, blatantly displayed its purpose as the students were detained for refusing to stop filling in the letters.

Chalk message left unfinished after police detained the students.

Chalk message left unfinished after police detained the students.

Erased hours later, the “research” institution’s message was made clear, ‘change is unwarranted when counter-intuitive to the well-being of the dominant public’– especially when truth is used to challenge.

Chalk message completely erased in less than 5 hours of police confrontation with student.

Chalk message completely erased in less than 5 hours of police confrontation with student.

~ Get Conscious

03/04/2014 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

The Colbert Family Responds to the Interracial Cheerios Commercial

by 02/05/2014
written by

Hours before the Superbowl, I got the chance to sit down with the Colbert family and hear their thoughts concerning the racial controversy that surrounded, and perhaps even eclipsed, their six-year-old daughter’s first acting job in a Cheerios commercial as the child of a bi-racial couple. With a sequel commercial aired during the Superbowl, the issue of interracial couples is back on the table; and this time with all of America watching.

 

Interviewer: Michael Holmes Jr

Interviewees: The Colbert family- Christopher Colbert, Janet Colbert, and Zoe “Gracie” Colbert

 

The Colbert family: Christopher Colbert (left), Janet Colbert (right) and their six year old daughter Zoe "Gracie" Colbert (middle) / Photo courtesy: Michael Holmes- NOMMO Staff

The Colbert family: Christopher Colbert (left), Janet Colbert (right) and their six year old daughter Zoe “Gracie” Colbert (middle) / Photo courtesy: Michael Holmes- NOMMO Staff

 

What was your initial reaction to the backlash that came from the first video?

Janet: I was a little bit surprised that people were making an issue of this especially out here in California. I mean I know that the comments could have come from all over the world… but [because it was] vocalized, [it] was shocking. I can see someone internalizing and thinking, “Uggh, that disgust me” because of their internalized thinking or whatever. But to actually say the things that were said; I was just shocked. I was just like…really?

Chris: Me, on the other hand, as I said before, I was excited, because it gets the issue out. It allows us to have a discussion about [interracial relationships and biracial children].

If you think about it, America, we’re still very much divided and segregated.

 

Many of the racist comments expressed anger and even disgust at the sight of a mixed raced family. Is this what you encounter in daily life as an interracial couple?

Janet: No. As far as my social settings and my immediate family and friends, no.

 

So what does that tell you, when on the day to day you don’t get this negativity, but then the commercial received this kind of response?  

Janet: That our minds have progressed, but everyone’s hasn’t.

Chris:  You see, you have a local type of setting, and then you have a larger typesetting. Those people [who are responding negatively], they’re fine [with interracial marriage] as long as it’s local. But when you try to make this a national thing they’re like, naw, we’re not okay with this.

 

So do you think that a part of the backlash comes from the promotion of interracial couples?

Chris: Yup.

Janet:  Well, I don’t believe this ad was trying to promote interracial anything. I think it was just an ad. I think it was just a point about relationship; this is world we live in today, this is what we see.

I was actually excited about the fact that they were using parents that were actually representative of the child. Because a lot of time, with biracial children, they either go with a Black family or a White family.  So the fact that they actually [represented] where she comes from… I thought it was nice to have that representation, verses trying to make her look like she belongs to one or the other.

 

Given all the interracial marriages in the United States, why do you think there is still a marketing tubule with interracial couples? What does that say about America given that we have a Black president?

Chris: Look, let’s just face it; it’s always going to be here. That divide that has always been here from the beginning, it’s always going to be there. My take on is this… we won’t be stopped. What I mean by that is, people are going to love who they’re going to love. People are going to fall in love with who they’re going to fall in love with… which is what the commercial was trying to show… having this family shows that hey, there are two different groups of people who from two different background, who  happen to love each other, they came together and had this mixed child and so.… Have some cheerios. (He chuckled)

 

More people liked the video than disliked it, right?

Both: Yes.

 

Do you think this represents American perspective on interracial dating?

Both: Yes.

 

Who do you think the opposition was coming from? Do you have any ideas about rather the Whites or the Blacks are the aggressors as far as the negative comments are concerned?

Janet: Again, we have to remember with the diversity in the United States, there are not just two races. So it’s not just either this side, or these people. Because a lot of people were saying, “You know, women thought this and men thought that.” I don’t buy into any of that stereotyping at all.

 

What do you mean?

Janet: …Because the comments were saying perhaps they [the racist remarks] were coming from White men, who didn’t want to see a White women with a Black man; or Black women who didn’t want to see their Black man with a White women… you know what I mean? And I just don’t believe there was any stereotype with where the comments were coming for except from people that just really don’t have anything better to do than to try to be critical… and are uneducated and just kind of unaware of where we are today.

That’s not to say that people don’t have their own opinion. Everyone entitled to their own opinion, and there is free speech.  So they are welcome to say what they want to say but that doesn’t mean because that person who made the comment happens to be a White woman that all White women feel this way.

 

So I just want to get this straight; you saying that this isn’t coming from any one side; this is America as a whole, all races and genders, having a problem with this ad?

Chris: Yea, this problem is happening with Asian Americans who gets married and has children with a Black man. Or if there is a Native American Indian woman that married a Caucasian man…  it all mixes.

Janet: And it’s always important to remember that the negativity was a very small percentage. So I don’t think that this is a representation of where America is today.

 

So, do you think too much was made out of the racism? Was the negativity blown out of proportion?

Chris: Well, we can’t really answer that because it (the comments) got shut down pretty quick.

 

How is Zoey taking it all?

Janet:  She had no idea. It wasn’t until probably later on this school year… I’m thinking of that little Meme that said, “With all the problems in the world, are you really upset that my parents don’t match?” that’s kind of what she [Zoey] asked me. She said, “All this is because daddy is Black and you’re White?”  And I said, “Yea, a lot of it was.” And her face was like, “That doesn’t even make sense”.

All she’s ever been exposed to is parents that are together, that are raising her as a family, and that her brothers look just like her… so for her, it didn’t make any kind of sense.  The things that make sense to kids are: am I being fed? Am I being cared for? Am I being nurtured? You know what I mean?  They might not describe it in those terms… but kids just want to be loved, and they don’t care what their parents look like.

 

How do you two deal with the many problems that interracial children deal with as far as identity is concerned? Many individuals that are multi-ethnic are faced with the “chose your side” dilemmas. How do you deal with this as parents of multi-ethnic kids?

Chris: I am glad you asked that question.  On applications, school applications, or whatever, they ask what gender the kids is, and we answer accordingly. And then they ask, what ethnicity is the child. And they have both a primary and a secondary; and this is the way we fill it out:

In the primary area, we go Caucasian, and we go Black. And the secondary area…we put nothing!

Know that this is who we are; there is no primary and there is no secondary. So, when it comes to a full-blooded African American, and they have the primary and the secondary, they just put Black; they don’t do anything with the secondary. Caucasians just put Caucasian. So when it comes to mixed [children} there is no secondary.

We (gesturing to his wife) are one. The African American and the Caucasian came together and made one mix. So there is no secondary. There is no primary.

When our kids grow they will see that we filled out every application like that, and we will teach our kids to fill out an application like that.

 

So if someone asked, ‘What is your daughter?’ You would say…?

Chris: She’s mixed. She’s African American and Caucasian.

 

How did you feel when you knew they wanted to do the commercial again?

Chris: We just felt very honored that they wanted to bring back the family.  We thought it was really cool. I wasn’t happy that “Yay we’re gonna do the interracial message.” I was just happy it was the super bowl you know. Our daughter is an actress, what she genuinely wants to do is act… and she happens to be from a multiracial background

And, believe it or not, it’s still hard for biracial children to get jobs because they are not exactly what the producers are looking for. So the fact that they used her again, on top of it being the super bowl, I’m still speechless.

On the first video there was an ambush of racial comments. This time around there doesn’t seem to be much backlash. What do you make of this?

Janet: He doesn’t pay as much attention to this stuff as I do– I mean I read every single comment and I have been very very blessed by what I’ve read. And the feed back I’ve seen has been positive.

 

So where did all the racists people go?

Janet: Well, don’t get me wrong; there has been a few negative comments on the new YouTube spot. I read one today that said, “Oops, they did it again, now I want to puke” or something like that. So they’re still there, there just not as vocal this time around.

 

What do you guys hope will come from this sequel?

Chris: We pray for more opportunities, because this is something she loves and like doing—this is her dream.

We hope that this will open more doors for her and, hopefully, help bring America together.

 

You can watch the Cheerio commercial here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKuQrKeGe6g

 

02/05/2014 17 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Editor-in-Chief Dasha Zhukova Sits on Naked Black Woman

by 01/27/2014
written by

dasha-zhukova-black-woman-chair-miroslava-duma-buro-247-interview

On January 20th, 2014, Martin Luther King Day, an online magazine entitled Garage, published a photo of its Editor-in-chief, Dasha Zhukova, sitting on a chair made to resemble a half-naked Black woman. Miroslava Duma, the blog’s editor, posted the insensitive photo on Instagram, and further marketed the image as something of trending, fashionable, and contemporary art.  In the image, the Moscow-born 32-year-old, wearing a pressed white button-up and crisp blue jeans, rests on a chair designed to portray a life-form Black mannequin that is naked, excusing a pair of leather black panties, a belt strapped around her lower body, elbow length gloves and skin-tight, and knee-high boots.

Dasha Zhukova responds to the criticism: “The chair pictured in the Buro 24/7 website interview is an artwork created by Norwegian artist Bjarne Melgaard, one of a series that reinterprets historical artworks from artist Allen Jones as a commentary on gender and racial politics. Its use in this photo shoot is regrettable as it took the artwork totally out of its intended context. I regret allowing an artwork with such charged meaning to be used in this context. I utterly abhor racism and would like to apologize to those offended by my participation in this shoot.”

Despite, her claim, the backlash of noted fashion journalists and the common public have displayed their disapproval of Zhukova’s work of art as a form of degradation.  Claire Sulmers, the editor of Fashion Bomb Daily, spoke of the unfortunate feature and calls the image an example of “White dominance and superiority, articulated in a seemingly serene yet overtly degrading way.”

“These issues and concerns highlight the conflicts found within the continued suppression of the Black female body in the fashion industry and its urge to be addressed. The art and fashion industries are the few bastions of society where blatant racism and ignorance are given the green light in the name of creativity,” Sulmers complained.

Claire Sulmers could be making a significant point. Although the chair is supposed to be portraying vision and creativity, it is offensive, tasteless, and one cannot help but to be investigative about the motives behind the editorial, and the reasoning behind its overall inspiration.

In response to the negative and insensitive imagery, how do we as a Black community continue to effectively address these issues that plague the fashion industry? Also, how do we highlight the issues circulating the recurrent theme of the Black body being dissected, misappropriated, and exploited in the media? What do you think of Garage Magazine’s fashion editorial? Can it be perceived as a work of art or as flat-out, blatant racism? Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

01/27/2014 70 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Archive

Peggy Noland’s Shocking Oprah Dress

by 12/16/2013
written by
Peggy-Nolands-Outrageous-Oprah-Dress-

Source: Fashion Bomb Daily

Most recently, there has been quite a stir about the particular fashionable taste of fashion designer Peggy Noland. One of her graphic dresses displays a life-size image of what appears to be an unknown, and unclothed, Afrikan American female with a photo-shopped image of Oprah’s face in exchange.  There are multiple images of women and even one with an image of a KISS member photos-shopped as the head of the body.

Looks familiar doesn’t it? I’m sure UCLA students are quite familiar with similar occurrences happening against the Dr. Christian Head versus UC Regents, where Professor Head was mocked in a class presentation and his head cropped onto an image of a kneeling gorilla. Only this time, they done went and tried to play Oprah! Stirring questions about the dress itself have assessed many critical debates and disagreements.

In fact, in XOjane.com, Black writer Veronica Miller expressed her outrage with the dress and shared her disapproval. Miller writes:

“‘Progressive’ White women, you need to quit. This thing that you keep doing, exploring your own issues with repressed sexuality and body image through the use of Black women who didn’t give you permission to be self-image surrogates? [It] needs to stop, and it needs to come to an end now. Not now, but RIGHT now. We are not playgrounds where you get to explore your issues. You don’t get to use our bodies as the shield behind which you throw up your middle finger up at patriarchy. These stunts make you no better than patriarchs, no better than misogynists. You take our bodies apart and display them in pieces the same exact way you admonish advertising, fashion and music for doing. That is hypocritical behavior and hypocritical behavior is tired.”

Peggy Noland wearing her "design"/ Source: Fashion Bomb Daily

Peggy Noland wearing her “design”/ Source: Fashion Bomb Daily

Miller’s disapproval cannot be dismissed as illogical. In fact, it is quite common for members of the Afrikan American community to share experiences dealing with being ostracized or feeling singled out for their physical features. Fashionbombdaily.com stated, “Black women have dealt with the misappropriation and exploitation of their bodies by others since Saartjie Baartman first stepped onto European soil in the 19th century. It’s 2013—you’d hope people would know better by now. Sadly, they don’t.”

And just when you thought it couldn’t get worst.

Lena Adelsohn Liljeroth, Sweden’s Minister of Culture and Sports, was video-recorded laughing and smiling as she posed with other coworkers in front of the cake of an Afrikan woman. (See it for yourself: www.youtube.com/watch?v=etAYFadObVY)

Now this was not just any ordinary cake. In fact, Black artist Makode Aj Linde who designed the cake described the pastry dessert as a ‘genital mutilation cake.’ Linde designed the cake to make screaming, painful noises as it was being sliced into.  As people sliced into the “woman’s vagina”, the depiction behind it suggest she was being “mutilated.”

In the video, the people who are indulging in the cake are seen standing around laughing in enjoyment and making a mockery of the Black bodied cake.

Is there a thin line between what is appropriately considered creative and ill bred? How much more do Black women have to overcome in order to be viewed as whole beings and not as human spectacles? How far is too far and where can we as a community begin to send waves and break barriers in order to correct these problematic issues found in the Afrikan-American community?

 

Raise your voice in the comment box below!

 

Author: Ashley Joseph

Nommo Staff

 

12/16/2013 2,804 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Latest Posts

  • Museums Suck: The Getty’s Black Photography Exhibit
    by Faith Olaleye
  • Use of Force, the Long American Tradition
    by Bahji Steele
  • Black Girl, Take Up Space: Lessons From JaNa Craig
    by Mariah Yonique Strawder
  • Back to Black Wednesday: A Night of Jazz
    by Faith Olaleye
  • A Night with Willow Smith at Blue Note Jazz Club
    by Bahji Steele

Back To Top
NOMMO
  • Home
  • Campus
  • World
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • About
    • Why We Use “K” vs. “C”
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Skip Erewhon, Simply Wholesome has the O.G. LA Wellness smoothie